Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge

dc.contributor.author
Bernal, Jorge
dc.contributor.author
Tajbakhsh, Nima
dc.contributor.author
Sánchez, F. Javier
dc.contributor.author
Matuszewski, Bogdan J.
dc.contributor.author
Chen, Hao
dc.contributor.author
Yu, Lequan
dc.contributor.author
Angermann, Quentin
dc.contributor.author
Romain, Olivier
dc.contributor.author
Rustad, Bjorn
dc.contributor.author
Balasingham, Ilangko
dc.contributor.author
Pogorelov, Konstantin
dc.contributor.author
Choi, Sungbin
dc.contributor.author
Debard, Quentin
dc.contributor.author
Maier-Hein, Lena
dc.contributor.author
Speidel, Stefanie
dc.contributor.author
Stoyanov, Danail
dc.contributor.author
Brandao, Patrick
dc.contributor.author
Cordova, Henry
dc.contributor.author
Sánchez Montes, Cristina
dc.contributor.author
Gurudu, Suryakanth R.
dc.contributor.author
Fernández Esparrach, Glòria
dc.contributor.author
Dray, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Liang, Jianming
dc.contributor.author
Histace, Aymeric
dc.date.issued
2018-06-29T17:26:02Z
dc.date.issued
2018-06-29T17:26:02Z
dc.date.issued
2017-06
dc.date.issued
2018-06-29T17:26:03Z
dc.identifier
0278-0062
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/123294
dc.identifier
667757
dc.identifier
28182555
dc.description.abstract
Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colon cancer screening though some polyps are still missed, thus preventing early disease detection and treatment. Several computational systems have been proposed to assist polyp detection during colonoscopy but so far without consistent evaluation. The lack of publicly available annotated databases has made it difficult to compare methods and to assess if they achieve performance levels acceptable for clinical use. The Automatic Polyp Detection sub-challenge, conducted as part of the Endoscopic Vision Challenge (http://endovis.grand-challenge.org) at the international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2015, was an effort to address this need. In this paper, we report the results of this comparative evaluation of polyp detection methods, as well as describe additional experiments to further explore differences between methods. We define performance metrics and provide evaluation databases that allow comparison of multiple methodologies. Results show that convolutional neural networks are the state of the art. Nevertheless, it is also demonstrated that combining different methodologies can lead to an improved overall performance.
dc.format
18 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
dc.relation
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042
dc.relation
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2017, vol. 36, num. 6, p. 1231-1249
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042
dc.rights
(c) Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject
Colonoscòpia
dc.subject
Càncer colorectal
dc.subject
Endoscòpia
dc.subject
Colonoscopy
dc.subject
Colorectal cancer
dc.subject
Endoscopy
dc.title
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.