Bias in diet determination: Incorporating traditional methods in Bayesian mixing models

dc.contributor.author
Franco-Trecu, Valentina
dc.contributor.author
Drago, Massimiliano
dc.contributor.author
Riet-Sapriza, Federico G.
dc.contributor.author
Parnell, Andrew
dc.contributor.author
Frau, Rosina
dc.contributor.author
Inchausti, Pablo
dc.date.issued
2018-05-07T11:59:21Z
dc.date.issued
2018-05-07T11:59:21Z
dc.date.issued
2013-11-05
dc.date.issued
2018-05-07T11:59:21Z
dc.identifier
1932-6203
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/122135
dc.identifier
671026
dc.identifier
24224031
dc.description.abstract
There are not "universal methods" to determine diet composition of predators. Most traditional methods are biased because of their reliance on differential digestibility and the recovery of hard items. By relying on assimilated food, stable isotope and Bayesian mixing models (SIMMs) resolve many biases of traditional methods. SIMMs can incorporate prior information (i.e. proportional diet composition) that may improve the precision in the estimated dietary composition. However few studies have assessed the performance of traditional methods and SIMMs with and without informative priors to study the predators' diets. Here we compare the diet compositions of the South American fur seal and sea lions obtained by scats analysis and by SIMMs-UP (uninformative priors) and assess whether informative priors (SIMMs-IP) from the scat analysis improved the estimated diet composition compared to SIMMs-UP. According to the SIMM-UP, while pelagic species dominated the fur seal's diet the sea lion's did not have a clear dominance of any prey. In contrast, SIMM-IP's diets compositions were dominated by the same preys as in scat analyses. When prior information influenced SIMMs' estimates, incorporating informative priors improved the precision in the estimated diet composition at the risk of inducing biases in the estimates. If preys isotopic data allow discriminating preys' contributions to diets, informative priors should lead to more precise but unbiased estimated diet composition. Just as estimates of diet composition obtained from traditional methods are critically interpreted because of their biases, care must be exercised when interpreting diet composition obtained by SIMMs-IP. The best approach to obtain a near-complete view of predators' diet composition should involve the simultaneous consideration of different sources of partial evidence (traditional methods, SIMM-UP and SIMM-IP) in the light of natural history of the predator species so as to reliably ascertain and weight the information yielded by each method.
dc.format
8 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080019
dc.relation
PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, num. 11, p. 1-8
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080019
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Franco-Trecu, Valentina et al., 2013
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)
dc.subject
Dieta
dc.subject
Predació (Biologia)
dc.subject
Estadística bayesiana
dc.subject
Diet
dc.subject
Predation (Biology)
dc.subject
Bayesian statistical decision
dc.title
Bias in diet determination: Incorporating traditional methods in Bayesian mixing models
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)