dc.contributor.author
Gilabert Barberà, Pau
dc.date.issued
2010-04-14T12:28:33Z
dc.date.issued
2010-04-14T12:28:33Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/12099
dc.description.abstract
Podeu consultar la versió en castellà a: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12125 ; i en català a: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12124
dc.description.abstract
The aim of this article is to show, by means of an accurate philological analysis of Plautarch's Eroticus, how Western Ethics has been clearly sexualized. Indeed, the specific features of masculine bodies become the suitable ones to define what is really ethical, while the specific features of feminine bodies become in their turn the suitable ones to define what is by no means ethical.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.relation
Anuari de Filologia,XXII secció D (2003), núm. 10, pp. 35-50
dc.relation
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12125
dc.relation
http://hdl.handle.net/2445/12124
dc.rights
cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Gilabert, 2003
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Filologia Clàssica, Romànica i Semítica)
dc.subject
Plutarc. Amatorius
dc.subject
Filosofia grega
dc.subject
Estudis de gènere
dc.subject
Misogínia grega
dc.subject
Plutarch. Amatorius
dc.subject
Greek philosophy
dc.subject
Gender studies
dc.subject
Greek misogyni
dc.title
The Ismenodora of Plutarch's Eroticus. (Has Western Culture "sexualized" -i. e. "masculinized"- Ethics?)
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
