dc.contributor.author
Arenas Prat, Meritxell
dc.contributor.author
Sabater, Sebastià
dc.contributor.author
Gascón, Marina
dc.contributor.author
Henríquez, Ivan
dc.contributor.author
Bueno, María José
dc.contributor.author
Rius, Àngels
dc.contributor.author
Rovirosa Casino, Angeles
dc.contributor.author
Gómez, David
dc.contributor.author
Lafuerza, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Biete Solà, Albert
dc.contributor.author
Colomer, Jordi
dc.date.issued
2018-03-21T18:36:07Z
dc.date.issued
2018-03-21T18:36:07Z
dc.date.issued
2014-12-04
dc.date.issued
2018-03-21T18:36:07Z
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/120970
dc.description.abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyse the reasons for not starting or for early of radiotherapy at the Radiation Oncology Department. METHODS: All radiotherapy treatments from March 2010 to February 2012 were included. Early withdrawals from treatment those that never started recorded. Clinical, demographic and dosimetric variables were also noted. RESULTS: From a total of 3250 patients treated and reviewed, 121 (4%) did not start or complete the planned treatment. Of those, 63 (52%) did not receive any radiotherapy fraction and 58 (48%) did not complete the course, 74% were male and 26% were female. The mean age was 67 ± 13 years. The most common primary tumour was lung (28%), followed by rectum (16%). The aim of treatment was 62% radical and 38% palliative, 44% of patients had metastases; the most common metastatic site was bone, followed by brain. In 38% of cases (46 patients) radiotherapy was administered concomitantly with chemotherapy (10 cases (22%) were rectal cancers). The most common reason for not beginning or for early withdrawal of treatment was clinical progression (58/121, 48%). Of those, 43% died (52/121), 35 of them because of the progression of the disease and 17 from other causes. Incomplete treatment regimens were due to toxicity (12/121 (10%), of which 10 patients underwent concomitant chemotherapy for rectal cancer). CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients who did not complete their course of treatment is low, which shows good judgement in indications and patient selection. The most common reason for incomplete treatments was clinical progression. Rectal cancer treated with concomitant chemotherapy was the most frequent reason of the interruption of radiotherapy for toxicity.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
BioMed Central
dc.relation
Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0260-0
dc.relation
Radiation Oncology, 2014, vol. 9, num. 260
dc.relation
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0260-0
dc.rights
cc-by (c) Arenas Prat, Meritxell et al., 2014
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Articles publicats en revistes (Fonaments Clínics)
dc.subject
Avaluació de l'assistència mèdica
dc.subject
Satisfacció dels pacients
dc.subject
Medical care evaluation
dc.subject
Patient satisfaction
dc.title
Quality assurance in radiotherapy: analysis of the causes of not starting or early radiotherapy withdrawal.
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion