Sustainability assessment of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls with polyester reinforcement layers

dc.contributor
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Departament d'Enginyeria Civil i Ambiental
dc.contributor
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. GGMM - Grup de Geotècnia i Mecànica de Materials
dc.contributor.author
Moncada Ramírez, Aníbal Andrés
dc.contributor.author
Puig Damians, Ivan
dc.contributor.author
Olivella Pastallé, Sebastià
dc.contributor.author
Bathurst, Richard John
dc.date.accessioned
2026-03-03T00:19:53Z
dc.date.available
2026-03-03T00:19:53Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02-19
dc.identifier
Moncada, A. [et al.]. Sustainability assessment of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls with polyester reinforcement layers. «Geosynthetics international», 19 Febrer 2026,
dc.identifier
1751-7613
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/2117/456052
dc.identifier
10.1680/jgein.25.00085
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/2117/456052
dc.description.abstract
This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact permissions@emerald.com.
dc.description.abstract
The paper is focused on sustainability assessment of idealized geosynthetic reinforced soil walls constructed with polyester reinforcement layers using the MIVES multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Sustainability assessments cover environmental, economic, and social/functional components. In this study, the influence of different facing element types (precast concrete panels, welded wire mesh, and dry-cast concrete blocks) and different backfill materials (high-quality granular material, recycled concrete aggregate, and locally available soils with medium to low fines content) on sustainability rankings is investigated. Overall, no significant differences are observed between facing alternatives. Sustainability assessment scorings with precast concrete panels are slightly more favorable for lower walls, while dry-cast concrete blocks are slightly more favorable for taller walls. The use of locally available soils proved to be the most economic, environmentally friendly, and overall, the most sustainable alternative amongst the backfill soil options investigated, even when these soils have less mechanical strength. Total cost and global warming potential estimation charts for reinforced soil walls of different heights are provided.
dc.description.abstract
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of GECO Industrial (Korea, Rep.), VSL Construction Systems (Spain), the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DECA) of Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya·BarcelonaTech (UPC) (Spain), and the International Centre for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE) (Spain) and the funding received from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the “Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D” (CEX2018-000797-S-20-4).
dc.description.abstract
Peer Reviewed
dc.description.abstract
Postprint (author's final draft)
dc.format
18 p.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Emerald Publishing Limited
dc.relation
https://www.emerald.com/jgein/article-abstract/doi/10.1680/jgein.25.00085/1341858/Sustainability-assessment-of-geosynthetic?redirectedFrom=fulltext
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights
Open Access
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.subject
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Geotècnia::Mecànica de sòls
dc.subject
Geosynthetics
dc.subject
Sustainability
dc.subject
Life cycle analysis
dc.subject
LCA
dc.subject
MIVES
dc.subject
Reinforced soil walls
dc.title
Sustainability assessment of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls with polyester reinforcement layers
dc.type
Article


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

E-prints [72263]