Stream distance and vegetation structure are among the major factors affecting various groups of arthropods in non-riparian chestnut forests

dc.contributor.author
Albacete, Sergio
dc.contributor.author
Mac Nally, Ralph
dc.contributor.author
Carles Tolrá, Miguel
dc.contributor.author
Domènech, Marc
dc.contributor.author
Vives, Eduard
dc.contributor.author
Espadaler, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Pujade-Villar, Juli
dc.contributor.author
Serra, Antoni
dc.contributor.author
Maceda-Veiga, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned
2020-06-22T08:34:05Z
dc.date.accessioned
2024-12-10T14:12:58Z
dc.date.available
2022-01-20T01:45:07Z
dc.date.available
2024-12-10T14:12:58Z
dc.date.issued
2020-01-21
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2072/376185
dc.description.abstract
Streams are likely to be increasingly important for the conservation of non-riparian forest diversity with increased aridity due to climate change in many parts of the world. However, the importance of streams as promoters of non-riparian forest diversity has not been explored in detail. Given the likely stronger effect of surrounding habitats on open forests, we examined chestnut woodlands in northern Spain (n = 32) to explore the contribution of streams to variation in arthropod measures. We captured 5,490 arthropods (21 orders and 60 families) from which we calculated total abundance and richness and the abundance of trophic guilds. Vegetation structure at the tree and understory levels often made the largest independent contributions to explained variation in arthropod numbers and effects suggested alterations in arthropods’ food-web. Negative effects of stream-distance on taxon richness and the abundance of predators, omnivores and phytophages seemed to be largely mediated by vegetation structure. The exception was a strong univariate inverse association between the abundance of aerial predators and stream distance, possibly because wasps might be exploiting riverine habitats. Overall, effects of stream-distance were weaker for ground than for aerial arthropod groups. Moreover, arthropod numbers were greater at sites with low tree species richness and tall and species-rich understories, raising concerns for the ecological consequences of the abandonment of traditional forest practices in these woodlands. There are likely to be advantages for arthropod diversity and ecosystem services (e.g. pest control, nutrient cycling, pollination) if non-riparian forests are managed in a way that depends on stream-distance. Inferences may improve with a more complete knowledge of the biology of poorly studied groups, such as flies.
eng
dc.format.extent
45 p.
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartof
Forest Ecology and Management Volume 460, 15 March 2020, 117860
dc.rights
L'accés als continguts d'aquest document queda condicionat a l'acceptació de les condicions d'ús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.source
RECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya)
dc.subject.other
Artròpodes
dc.subject.other
Cadenes alimentàries (Ecologia)
dc.subject.other
Espanya
dc.subject.other
Península Ibèrica
dc.subject.other
Cursos d'aigua
dc.subject.other
Medi rural
dc.title
Stream distance and vegetation structure are among the major factors affecting various groups of arthropods in non-riparian chestnut forests
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.subject.udc
59
dc.embargo.terms
24 mesos
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117860
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess


Documents

Maceda_etal(2020).pdf

474.4Kb PDF

Maceda_etal(2020)_tables.pdf

577.6Kb PDF

Maceda_etal(2020)_figures.pdf

1002.Kb PDF

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)