From Françafrique to Chinafrica? Ecologically unequal exchange, neocolonialism, and environmental conflicts in Africa

dc.contributor
Universitat Ramon Llull. IQS
dc.contributor.author
Cantoni, Roberto
dc.contributor.author
Llavero-Pasquina, Marcel
dc.contributor.author
Apostolopoulou, Elia
dc.contributor.author
Gerber, Julien-François
dc.contributor.author
Bond, Patrick
dc.contributor.author
Martinez-Alier, Joan
dc.date.accessioned
2025-07-15T03:28:27Z
dc.date.issued
2025-09
dc.identifier.issn
1873-5991
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5430
dc.description.abstract
Africa stands out as the continent where the legacies of colonialism and the ongoing dynamics of neo- and post-colonialism are felt most profoundly. In its role as the primary global supplier of raw materials, and with the ongoing technological transition towards the so-called “smart” economy and “green” energy systems, the demand for minerals from Africa is anticipated to increase significantly. European imperialism and its historically embedded extractivist logic are indispensable to understand the conditions that gradually prompted many African states to seek new trading partners. But “coloniality” is not limited to historical colonialism. Over the last two decades China has gradually assumed a prominent role in African trade, becoming Africa’s first trading partner, and leading several scholars to ask whether China is developing a new kind of colonialism. The impact of extractive activities by European, American, and Chinese private and public companies on African resources has been profound, resulting in the shifting of socio-ecological costs from industrialised countries to the African extractive peripheries. In this work, we employ a political ecology approach to examine: i) the claims of lingering French imperialism and Chinese neocolonialism; and ii) the impact of projects implemented by actors from France and China in Africa. We mobilise the theory of ecologically unequal exchange and cases of environmental conflicts involving Chinese and French industries to demonstrate how these projects have resulted in damaging impacts over African territories, leading to land pollution and detrimental effects on community health. We find evidence of ecologically unequal exchange both in the Chinese and French cases, though the dynamics characterising the trading relations of these two countries with the ensemble of African countries is markedly different.
dc.format.extent
p.66
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartof
World Development 2025, 193
dc.rights
© L'autor/a
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Ecologically unequal exchange
dc.subject
Neocolonialism
dc.subject
Françafrique
dc.subject
Chinafrica
dc.subject
Environmental conflicts
dc.subject
Africa
dc.subject
Intercanvi ecològicament desigual
dc.subject
Economia ambiental
dc.subject
Imperialisme
dc.subject
França
dc.subject
Xina
dc.subject
Àfrica
dc.title
From Françafrique to Chinafrica? Ecologically unequal exchange, neocolonialism, and environmental conflicts in Africa
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.subject.udc
32
dc.subject.udc
33
dc.description.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.embargo.terms
24 mesos
dc.relation.projectID
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AGAUR/BP/2020 BP 00037
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107015
dc.date.embargoEnd
2027-09-01T02:00:00Z
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

IQS [794]