Institut Català de la Salut
[Le X] Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. [Sakai H] Department of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Kitaadachi-gun, Japan. [Felip E] Department of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Veillon R] CHU Bordeaux, Service des Maladies Respiratoires, Bordeaux, France. [Garassino MC] Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Knapp Center for Biomedical Discovery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. [Raskin J] Department of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
2023-04-18T08:36:49Z
2023-04-18T08:36:49Z
2022-03-15
Efficacy; Lung cancer
Eficacia; Cáncer de pulmón
Eficàcia; Càncer de pulmó
Purpose: Primary analysis of VISION showed tepotinib had durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present updated outcomes for clinically relevant subgroups. Patients and Methods: This phase II, open-label, multi-cohort study of 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC assessed efficacy and safety in predefined subgroups according to age, prior therapies (chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors), and brain metastases. An ad hoc retrospective analysis using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria assessed intracranial activity. Results: 152 patients were evaluable for efficacy (median age: 73.1). Overall, objective response rate (ORR) was 44.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.7–53.0]. Patients aged <75 (n = 84) and ≥75 (n = 68) had ORRs of 48.8% (95% CI: 37.7–60.0) and 39.7% (95% CI: 28.0–52.3), respectively. Treatment-naïve (n = 69) versus previously treated (n = 83) patients showed consistent efficacy [ORR (95% CI): 44.9% (32.9–57.4) vs. 44.6% (33.7–55.9); median duration of response (95% CI): 10.8 (6.9–not estimable) vs. 11.1 (9.5–18.5) months]. Of 15 patients analyzed by RANO-BM (12 received prior radiotherapy), 13 achieved intracranial disease control; 5 of 7 patients with measurable brain metastases had partial intracranial responses. Of 255 patients evaluable for safety, 64 (25.1%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), leading to discontinuation in 27 patients (10.6%). Rates of adverse events (AE) were broadly consistent irrespective of prior therapies. Conclusions: Tepotinib showed meaningful activity across subgroups by age, prior therapies, and brain metastases, with a manageable safety profile and few treatment discontinuations.
The trial was sponsored by the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945).
Article
Published version
English
Pulmons - Càncer - Tractament; Medicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic; Avaluació de resultats (Assistència sanitària); DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Thoracic Neoplasms::Respiratory Tract Neoplasms::Lung Neoplasms::Bronchial Neoplasms::Carcinoma, Bronchogenic::Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/drug therapy; CHEMICALS AND DRUGS::Chemical Actions and Uses::Pharmacologic Actions::Therapeutic Uses::Antineoplastic Agents; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/therapeutic use; ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Diagnosis::Prognosis::Treatment Outcome; ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias torácicas::neoplasias del tracto respiratorio::neoplasias pulmonares::neoplasias de los bronquios::carcinoma broncogénico::carcinoma de pulmón de células no pequeñas; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/farmacoterapia; COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS::acciones y usos químicos::acciones farmacológicas::usos terapéuticos::antineoplásicos; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/uso terapéutico; TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::diagnóstico::pronóstico::resultado del tratamiento
American Association for Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research;28(6)
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2733
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/