Treatment of impacted or retained second molars with the miniscrew-supported pole technique: a prospective follow-up study

Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[Lorente C, Lorente T] Department of Human Anatomy and Histology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. Lorente Orthodontic Clinic, Zaragoza, Spain. [Lorente P, Perez-Vela M] Lorente Orthodontic Clinic, Zaragoza, Spain. [Esquinas C] Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2023-01-10T08:10:33Z

2023-01-10T08:10:33Z

2022-10-10



Resumen

Ectopic eruption; Molar angulation; Surgical procedure


Erupción ectópica; Angulación molar; Procedimiento quirúrgico


Erupció ectòpica; Angulació molar; Procediment quirúrgic


Background Eruption disturbances of permanent molars are uncommon; however, it is important to treat them as soon as they are diagnosed. The main objective was to analyze the effectiveness of the “miniscrew-supported pole technique,” a surgically assisted orthodontic procedure to force the eruption of impacted/retained second molars (M2s) when there are indicators of complex molar inclusion. An observational prospective study was carried out during a 2-year period. Sociodemographic, clinical and low-dose scanner variables were taken at baseline (T0). Follow-up variables (T1) were the time between surgery and tooth eruption, radiographic measurements, debonding of buttons, failure rate of miniscrews and success rate of eruption. Results A total of 21 patients (mean age of 13.9 years) with 24 retained/impacted M2s were recruited; 13 molars were maxillary (54.2%) and 11 (45.8%) were mandibular. Six (25%) were impacted molars and 18 (75%) primarily retained. At T0, molar angulation was mesial in six molars (25%), distal in five molars (20.8%) and 13 molars were vertically positioned (54.2%). Infraocclusion degree was moderate in four (16.7%) molars and severe in 20 (83.3%). Only three (12.5%) third molars were removed due to lack of space. All M2s managed to erupt, achieving a success rate of 100%; however, two molars of the same patient did not achieve occlusion. The period of eruption after surgery was 126.8 (117.3) days. Anatomical radicular alteration was the only variable independently related to a longer time of treatment (p = 0.027). Conclusions The pole technique, using one mesial miniscrew and simple orthodontic mechanics, applies forces that succeed in erupting complicated retained/impacted M2s in a short period of time and with a low failure rate.

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

Springer

Documentos relacionados

Progress in Orthodontics;23

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00432-5

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)