The challenge of community mental health interventions with patients, relatives, and health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a real-world 9-month follow-up study

Abstract

Epidemiology; Human behaviour; Psychology

Epidemiologia; Comportament humà; Psicologia

Epidemiología, Comportamiento humano; Psicología

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to implement protocols that respond to the mental health demands of the population has been demonstrated. The PASMICOR programme started in March 2020, involving a total of 210 requests for treatment. Out of those subjects, the intervention was performed in 53 patients with COVID-19 without history of past psychiatric illness, 57 relatives and 60 health professionals, all of them within the area of Salamanca (Spain). Interventions were carried out by professionals of the public mental health service mostly by telephone. Depending on clinical severity, patients received basic (level I) or complex psychotherapeutic care combined with psychiatric care (level II). The majority of attended subjects were women (76.5%). Anxious-depressive symptoms were predominant, although sadness was more frequent in patients, insomnia in relatives and anxiety and fear in health professionals. 80% of the sample, particularly most of the health professionals, required a high-intensity intervention (level II). Nearly 50% of the people treated were discharged after an average of 5 interventions. Providing early care to COVID-19 patients, relatives and professionals by using community mental health resources can help to reduce the negative impact of crises, such as the pandemic, on the most affected population groups.

This work has been funded by the Castilla y León Regional Health Management (Spain) file no.: GRS COVID 59/A/20 “Impacto y abordaje de salud mental en familiares y pacientes afectos de COVID y en los profesionales sanitarios” (Impact and management of mental health in relatives, patients affected by COVID and health professionals). All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this study. The funding entities had no role in the design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, in the process of writing the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.