Institut Català de la Salut
[Garcia-Casado Z] Molecular Biology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain. [Oaknin A] Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Mendiola M] Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC) Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. [Alkorta-Aranburu G] CIMA LAB Diagnostics/Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. [Antunez-Lopez JR] Molecular Biology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Santiago, Santiago, Spain. [Moreno-Bueno G] Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC) Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. Fundacion MD Anderson, Madrid, Spain. Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas ‘Alberto Sols. Conexion Cancer (UAM-CSIC), Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM), IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
2022-12-02T13:09:14Z
2022-12-02T13:09:14Z
2022-11-04
Ovarian cancer; BRCA mutations; BRCA testing
Cáncer de ovarios; Mutaciones BRCA; Prueba BRCA
Càncer d'ovaris; Mutacions BRCA; Prova BRCA
Germline and tumor BRCA testing constitutes a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. Tissue testing is able to identify both germline (g) and somatic (s) BRCA variants, but tissue preservation methods and the widespread implementation of NGS represent pre-analytical and analytical challenges that need to be managed. This study was carried out on a multicenter prospective GEICO cohort of EOC patients with known gBRCA status in order to determine the inter-laboratory reproducibility of tissue sBRCA testing. The study consisted of two independent experimental approaches, a bilateral comparison between two reference laboratories (RLs) testing 82 formalin-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) EOC samples each, and a Ring Test Trial (RTT) with five participating clinical laboratories (CLs) evaluating the performance of tissue BRCA testing in a total of nine samples. Importantly, labs employed their own locally adopted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analytical approach. BRCA mutation frequency in the RL sub-study cohort was 23.17%: 12 (63.1%) germline and 6 (31.6%) somatic. Concordance between the two RLs with respect to BRCA status was 84.2% (gBRCA 100%). The RTT study distributed a total of nine samples (three commercial synthetic human FFPE references, three FFPE, and three OC DNA) among five CLs. The median concordance detection rate among them was 64.7% (range: 35.3–70.6%). Analytical discrepancies were mainly due to the minimum variant allele frequency thresholds, bioinformatic pipeline filters, and downstream variant interpretation, some of them with consequences of clinical relevance. Our study demonstrates a wide range of concordance in the identification and interpretation of BRCA sequencing data, highlighting the relevance of establishing standard criteria for detecting, interpreting, and reporting BRCA variants.
This research was funded by Astra Zéneca Farmacéutica Spain SA (Grant Number GEICO60-0).
Artículo
Versión publicada
Inglés
Ovaris - Càncer - Aspectes genètics; Cromosomes humans - Anomalies - Diagnòstic; DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Endocrine Gland Neoplasms::Ovarian Neoplasms; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/genetics; ANALYTICAL, DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT::Diagnosis::Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures::Clinical Laboratory Techniques::Genetic Testing; ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias de las glándulas endocrinas::neoplasias ováricas; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/genética; TÉCNICAS Y EQUIPOS ANALÍTICOS, DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS::diagnóstico::técnicas y procedimientos diagnósticos::técnicas de laboratorio clínico::pruebas genéticas
MDPI
Journal of Personalized Medicine;12(11)
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111842
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/