Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in older and younger patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 study (TAGS)

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Shitara K, Doi T] Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa-shi, Japan. [Hosaka H] Department of Gastroenterology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Ota, Gunma, Japan. [Thuss-Patience P] Medizinische Klinik m.S. Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. [Santoro A] Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy. [Longo F] Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain. [Alsina M] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2022-09-09T07:12:40Z

2022-09-09T07:12:40Z

2022-05



Abstract

Age groups; Gastrointestinal neoplasms; Trifluridine


Grupos de edad; Neoplasias gastrointestinales; Trifluridina


Grups d'edat; Neoplàsies gastrointestinals; Trifluridina


Background Trifluridine and tipiracil (FTD/TPI) demonstrated survival benefit vs placebo and manageable safety in previously treated patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC) in the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 TAGS study. This subgroup analysis of TAGS examined efficacy/safety outcomes by age. Methods In TAGS, patients with mGC/GEJC and ≥ 2 prior therapies were randomized (2:1) to receive FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 or placebo, plus best supportive care. A preplanned subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in patients aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years. Results Among 507 randomized patients (n = 337 FTD/TPI; n = 170 placebo), 55%, 45%, and 14% were aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years, respectively. Overall survival hazard ratios for FTD/TPI vs placebo were 0.67 (95% CI 0.51–0.89), 0.73 (95% CI 0.52–1.02), and 0.67 (95% CI 0.33–1.37) in patients aged < 65, ≥ 65, and ≥ 75 years, respectively. Regardless of age, patients receiving FTD/TPI experienced improved progression-free survival and stayed longer on treatment than those receiving placebo. Among FTD/TPI-treated patients, frequencies of any-cause grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age subgroups (80% each), although grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was more frequent in older patients [40% (≥ 65 and ≥ 75 years); 29% (< 65 years)]; AE-related discontinuation rates did not increase with age [14% (< 65 years), 12% (≥ 65 years), and 12% (≥ 75 years)]. Conclusions The results of this subgroup analysis show the efficacy and tolerability of FTD/TPI treatment regardless of age in patients with mGC/GEJC who had received 2 or more prior treatments.


This study was sponsored by Taiho Oncology, Inc., and Taiho Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. Professional medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Vasupradha Vethantham, PhD, and Jennifer L. Robertson, PhD, at Ashfield MedComms, an Ashfield Health company, funded by Taiho Oncology, Inc.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

Gastric Cancer;25

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01271-9

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)