[Bendsten P] Department of Medical Specialist and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Motala, Sweden. [Müssener U, Karlson N] Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. [López-Pelayo H] Grup Addiccions Clínic (GRA-GRE), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Red de Trastornos Adictivos (RTA), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Palacio-Vieira J, Colom J, Segura L] Programa d’Abús de Substàncies, Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya, Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Departament de Salut
2022-03-03T13:58:19Z
2022-03-03T13:58:19Z
2016-06-16
Alcohol screening; Brief intervention; Referral to electronic brief advice
Detección de alcohol; Intervención breve; Remisión a asesoramiento breve electrónico
Detecció d'alcoholèmia; Intervenció breu; Derivació a assessorament breu electrònic
Objectives: The objective of the present study was toexplore whether the possibility of offering facilitatedaccess to an alcohol electronic brief intervention (eBI) instead of delivering brief face-to-face advice increasedthe proportion of consulting adults who were screenedand given brief advice. Design: The study was a 12-week implementationstudy. Sixty primary healthcare units (PHCUs) in 5 jurisdictions (Catalonia, England, the Netherlands,Poland and Sweden) were asked to screen adults whoattended the PHCU for risky drinking. Setting: A total of 120 primary healthcare centresfrom 5 jurisdictions in Europe. Participants: 746 individual providers (generalpractitioners, nurses or other professionals)participated in the study. Primary outcome: Change in the proportion ofpatients screened and referred to eBI comparing abaseline 4-week preimplementation period with a12-week implementation period. Results: The possibility of referring patients to the eBIwas not found to be associated with any increase in theproportion of patients screened. However, it wasassociated with an increase in the proportion of screen-positive patients receiving brief advice from 70% to 80% for the screen-positive sample as a whole(p<0.05), mainly driven by a significant increase in briefintervention rates in England from 87% to 96%(p<0.01). The study indicated that staff displayed a lowlevel of engagement in this new technology. Staffcontinued to offer face-to-face advice to a largerproportion of patients (54%) than referral to eBI (38%). In addition, low engagement was seen among thereferred patients; on average, 18% of the patientslogged on to the website with a mean log-on rate acrossthe different countries between 0.58% and 36.95%. Conclusions: Referral to eBI takes nearly as muchtime as brief oral advice and might require moreintroduction and training before staff are comfortablewith referring to eBI
The research leading to these results or outcomes has receivedfunding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme forResearch, Technological Development and Demonstration under grantagreement no. 259268—Optimizing Delivery of Health Care Interventions(ODHIN).
Article
Published version
English
Telemedicina; Atenció primària; Alcoholisme - Prevenció; HEALTH CARE::Health Services Administration::Patient Care Management::Delivery of Health Care::Telemedicine; DISEASES::Chemically-Induced Disorders::Substance-Related Disorders::Alcohol-Related Disorders::Alcoholism; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/prevention & control; ATENCIÓN DE SALUD::administración de los servicios de salud::gestión de la atención al paciente::prestación sanitaria::telemedicina; ENFERMEDADES::trastornos inducidos químicamente::trastornos relacionados con sustancias::trastornos relacionados con el alcohol::alcoholismo; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/prevención & control
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ open;6(6)
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010271
Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/