[Keurhorst M] Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Centre for Nursing Research, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Deventer, Enschede, The Netherlands. [Anderson P] Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, England, UK. Department of Family Medicine, School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. [Heinen M] Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [Bendsten P] Department of Medical Specialist and Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Motala, Sweden. [Baena B, Colom J, Palacio-Vieira J, Segura L] Programa d’Abús de Substàncies, Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPCAT), Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Departament de Salut
2022-03-03T13:45:23Z
2022-03-03T13:45:23Z
2016-07-16
Brief interventions; Risky drinking; Primary healthcare
Intervenciones breves; Bebedores de riesgo; Atención primaria
Intervencions breus; Bevedors de risc; Atenció primària
Background: Brief interventions in primary healthcare are cost-effective in reducing drinking problems but poorly implemented in routine practice. Although evidence about implementing brief interventions is growing, knowledge is limited with regard to impact of initial role security and therapeutic commitment on brief intervention implementation. Methods: In a cluster randomised factorial trial, 120 primary healthcare units (PHCUs) were randomised to eight groups: care as usual, training and support, financial reimbursement, and the opportunity to refer patients to an internet-based brief intervention (e-BI); paired combinations of these three strategies, and all three strategies combined. To explore the impact of initial role security and therapeutic commitment on implementing brief interventions, we performed multilevel linear regression analyses adapted to the factorial design. Results: Data from 746 providers from 120 PHCUs were included in the analyses. Baseline role security and therapeutic commitment were found not to influence implementation of brief interventions. Furthermore, there were no significant interactions between these characteristics and allocated implementation groups. Conclusions: The extent to which providers changed their brief intervention delivery following experience of different implementation strategies was not determined by their initial attitudes towards alcohol problems. In future research, more attention is needed to unravel the causal relation between practitioners’ attitudes, their actual behaviour and care improvement strategies to enhance implementation science.
The research leading to these results or outcomes has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 259268 – Optimizing delivery of healthcare intervention (ODHIN).
Artículo
Versión publicada
Inglés
Atenció primària; Alcoholisme - Prevenció; DISEASES::Chemically-Induced Disorders::Substance-Related Disorders::Alcohol-Related Disorders::Alcoholism; Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/prevention & control; HEALTH CARE::Health Services Administration::Patient Care Management::Comprehensive Health Care::Primary Health Care; ENFERMEDADES::trastornos inducidos químicamente::trastornos relacionados con sustancias::trastornos relacionados con el alcohol::alcoholismo; Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/prevención & control; ATENCIÓN DE SALUD::administración de los servicios de salud::gestión de la atención al paciente::atención integral de salud::atención primaria de la salud
BioMed Central
Implementation science;11
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0468-5
Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/