Polypropylene and polyvinylidene fluoride transobturator slings for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year outcomes from a multicentre randomized trial

Other authors

[Sabadell J] Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. General Surgery Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Pereda-Núñez A, Sarasa-Castelló N] Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain. [Ojeda-de-Los-Santos F] Department of Gynecology, Hospital Quirón Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain. [Urbaneja M] Department of Gynecology, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain. [González-García C] Department of Gynecology, Hospital de Viladecans, Barcelona, Spain. [Camps-Lloveras N] Functional Urology and Urodynamics Unit, Department of Urology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Hospital General de Granollers

Publication date

2021-11-25T10:27:10Z

2021-11-25T10:27:10Z

2021-01



Abstract

Polypropylene; Polyvinylidene fluoride; Stress urinary incontinence


Polipropileno; Fluoruro de polivinilideno; Incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo


Polipropilè; Fluorur de polivinilidè; Incontinència urinària d'esforç


Aims: To compare the effectiveness and safety of polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) transobturator tapes (TOT) for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: This is a multicentre randomized trial. Women with SUI or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence and scheduled for a TOT procedure were randomized to PP or PVDF slings. The primary outcome was 1-year cure or improvement rate using composite criteria. Complications were also compared. Relationships with outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regressions models. Results: From April 2016 to January 2018 285 participants were randomized. PP and PVDF slings showed similar high cure or improvement rate (91.0% vs. 95.6%, p = .138). Improvement in validated questionnaires was also similar. PVDF slings were associated with a lower rate of de novo urgency incontinence (adjusted odds ratio = 0.35; 95% confidence interval = 0.15-0.80). We found no statistical differences in complications rates, although a higher incidence of long-term pain events were observed in the PP group. The study is underpowered to find differences in specific complications owing to the low number of events. Conclusion: PP and PVDF TOTs are equally effective, although PVDF is associated with fewer cases of de novo urgency incontinence. Further studies are needed to give robust conclusions on safety profiles.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Wiley

Related items

Neurourology and Urodynamics;40(1)

https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24586

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)