Early radiologic tumour volume response in non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma is not predictive for survival

Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[de Vries ISA] Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, CS Utrecht, Netherlands. [Morosi C] Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. [Bisogno G] Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. Pediatric Hematology Oncology Division, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy. [Minard Colin V] Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave-Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. [Coppadoro B] Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. [Zanetti I] Pediatric Hematology Oncology Division, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy. [Guillen G] Servei de Cirurgia Pediàtrica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2025-10-31T07:25:50Z

2025-10-31T07:25:50Z

2025-09



Resumen

Paediatric oncology; Radiological response assessment; Rhabdomyosarcoma


Oncología pediátrica; Evaluación de la respuesta radiológica; Rabdomiosarcoma


Oncologia pediàtrica; Avaluació de la resposta radiològica; Rabdomiosarcoma


Background There is an urgent need for early radiological markers predicting survival in paediatric rhabdomyosarcoma patients. Objective To analyse the predictive value of early radiological tumour volume response to chemotherapy in non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma patients. Methods The European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 study prospectively included non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma patients. Patients with Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS) postsurgical Group III (i.e. measurable disease) at diagnosis, with three tumour diameters available at diagnosis and following three cycles of chemotherapy, were included. Tumour response was categorized as complete response, partial response, minor partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease. Patients with progressive disease were excluded from analyses. Failure-free survival and overall survival were estimated with Kaplan-Meier using a landmark analysis. Prognostic factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results Of 1,674 patients aged < 18 years at diagnosis included in the EpSSG RMS 2005 study, 613 patients (median age 4.2 years, interquartile range 2.2–8.0, 346 males) were eligible for analysis. After three cycles of chemotherapy, 48 patients reached complete response, 371 partial response, 139 minor partial response, 48 stable disease, and seven patients progressive disease. Univariate Cox proportional hazards model showed no significant difference between response groups for failure-free survival or overall survival. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, tumour volume response was not an independent prognostic factor for failure-free survival or overall survival. Conclusion Early radiological tumour volume response after the third cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with exclusion of progressive disease, does not predict survival in paediatric rhabdomyosarcoma patients.


Alice's Arc, a children’s cancer charity focusing on rhabdomyosarcoma, United Kingdom (alicesarc.org), has funded data management and statistical processing for current analyses.

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

Springer

Documentos relacionados

Pediatric Radiology;55

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06359-3

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)