Comparing cognitive reserve between patients with bipolar disorder, other psychiatric disorders and healthy controls: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis

Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[D'Alessandro G] Psychiatric Unit 2, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy. [Sommerhoff C, Bort M, De Prisco M, Fico G, Oliva V] Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Institut de Neurociències, Universitat de Barcelona (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain. Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. [Amoretti S] Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. Grup de Recerca de Psiquiatria, Salut Mental i Addiccions, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2025-10-30T08:47:48Z

2025-10-30T08:47:48Z

2025-10



Resumen

Bipolar disorder; Cognitive impairment; Cognitive reserve


Trastorn bipolar; Deteriorament cognitiu; Reserva cognitiva


Trastorno bipolar; Deterioro cognitivo; Reserva cognitiva


Background Cognitive Reserve (CR) has been proposed as a protective factor against cognitive decline and functional impairment in psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder (BD). However, how CR differs between BD, other psychiatric populations, and healthy individuals remains unclear. Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate differences in CR between individuals with BD, healthy controls (HCs), at-risk populations, and patients with other psychiatric disorders. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies assessing CR in BD and control populations, using validated CR measures or proxies (e.g., education, intelligence quotient, occupational status, leisure activities). A multilevel random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare CR levels between BD and HCs, and BD and other psychiatric disorders. Results Twelve studies (N = 1861 participants) met inclusion criteria. Meta-analytic findings revealed that individuals with BD exhibited significantly lower CR than HCs (SMD = -0.45, 95 % CI: -0.69 to -0.20, I² = 84.5 %), whereas no significant differences emerged between BD and MDD (SMD = -0.23, 95 % CI: -0.49 to 0.03, I² = 41.7 %). Sociodemographic and clinical variables did not significantly moderate CR levels. Conclusion CR is lower in BD compared to HCs, suggesting its contribution to cognitive and functional impairments. Conversely, similar CR between BD and MDD highlight shared clinical vulnerabilities. These results underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance CR in patients with BD. Future research should prioritize standardized CR assessment and investigate modifiable factors contributing to CR development in psychiatric populations.

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

Elsevier

Documentos relacionados

Psychiatry Research;352

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116699

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)