2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome: more lights rise but shade remains

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Alijotas-Reig J] Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Servei de Medicina Interna, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. [Miro-Mur F] Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. [Hoxha A] Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, Padova, Veneto, Italy. [Khamashta MA] Medical Affairs, GSK, London, UK. [Shoenfeld Y] Reichmann University, Herzelia, Israel and Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-10-29T13:40:32Z

2025-10-29T13:40:32Z

2025-07



Abstract

Antiphospholipid antibodies; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Autoimmune diseases


Anticuerpos antifosfolípidos; Síndrome antifosfolípido; Enfermedades autoinmunes


Anticossos antifosfolipídics; Síndrome antifosfolipídica; Malalties autoimmunitàries


Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder for which there are no universally accepted diagnostic criteria, although classification criteria do exist, as is the case with most autoimmune diseases. Until 2023, the 2006 Sydney classification criteria were in use. Although originally intended for research purposes, these criteria have often been employed in clinical practice as a substitute for diagnostic guidelines, thereby conflating classification with diagnosis. In July 2023, ACR and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology convened a panel of experts to revise these criteria. The newly published classification criteria are explicitly intended for research use only. They place a strong emphasis on specificity—99%—but this comes at the expense of sensitivity—84%. The updated criteria encompass six clinical domains and two laboratory domains. Notably, the inclusion of new clinical features, such as thrombocytopenia, cardiac valve involvement and microvascular thrombosis, has broadened patient inclusion and, indirectly, aided the diagnostic process. However, a significant proportion of patients with suspected antiphospholipid antibody-related conditions may no longer meet the criteria for APS classification. In real-world settings, this could result in these individuals being denied appropriate management, thereby increasing their risk of subsequent thrombotic or obstetric events, as has already been demonstrated. This manuscript examines the advantages and limitations of the new clinical and laboratory domains, considering their implications not only from a research but also from a clinical perspective, APS.


This manuscript was partially funded by Gravida Fertilitat Avancada (Barcelona, Spain; Gravida- JAR/2025), and Synlab (Barcelona, Spain; Synlab- JAR 01/2024).

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

BMJ

Related items

RMD Open;11(3)

https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006014

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)