Deep Learning Unravels Differences Between Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Cycle Time Series from Two Control Samples of Healthy Children Assessed in Two Different Gait Laboratories

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[de Gorostegui A] PhD Program in Neuroscience, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid-Cajal Institute, Madrid, Spain. Department of Anatomy, Histology & Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain. [Kiernan D] Movement Analysis Laboratory, Central Remedial Clinic, Clontarf, Dublin, Ireland. [Martín-Gonzalo JA] Escuela Universitaria de Fisioterapia de la ONCE, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. [López-López J] Department of Rehabilitation, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Fundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía y Hospital del Henares, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain. Departamento de Medicina, Salud y Deporte, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain. [Pulido-Valdeolivas I, Rausell E] Department of Anatomy, Histology & Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain. [Gómez-Andrés D] Grup de Recerca en Neurologia Pediàtrica, ERN-RND, Euro-NMD, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Servei de Neurologia Pediàtrica, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-03-14T10:51:52Z

2025-03-14T10:51:52Z

2024

2025-01



Abstract

Children; Deep learning; Gait


Niños; Aprendizaje profundo; Marcha


Nens; Aprenentatge profund; Marxa


We investigate the application of deep learning in comparing gait cycle time series from two groups of healthy children, each assessed in different gait laboratories. Both laboratories used similar gait analysis protocols with minimal differences in data collection. Utilizing a ResNet-based deep learning model, we successfully identified the source laboratory of each dataset, achieving a high classification accuracy across multiple gait parameters. To address the inter-laboratory differences, we explored various pre-processing methods and time series properties that may have been detected by the algorithm. We found that the standardization of the time series values was a successful approach to decrease the ability of the model to distinguish between the two centers. Our findings also reveal that differences in the power spectra and autocorrelation structures of the datasets play a significant role in the model performance. Our study emphasizes the importance of standardized protocols and robust data pre-processing to enhance the transferability of machine learning models across clinical settings, particularly for deep learning approaches.


This research was funded by Escuela Universitaria de Fisioterapia ONCE-UAM and TACTIC project—FORTALECE ISCIII grant no. FORT23/00034, Grant CNS2023-144775 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 by “European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR”. This project has also received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No. 851255). This work has been partially supported by the María de Maeztu project CEX2021-001164-M funded by the MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FEDER, EU. This research has been supported by a grant for an international stay from the Universidad Autonoma de Madrid travel grants Program for participation in International Research Conferences.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

MDPI

Related items

Sensors;25(1)

https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010110

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/851255

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)