First-in-human phase 1 study of the arginase inhibitor INCB001158 alone or combined with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Naing A] MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. [Papadopoulos KP] START San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA. [Pishvaian MJ] MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. [Rahma O, Hanna GJ] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [Garralda E, Saavedra O] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-02-06T09:15:43Z

2025-02-06T09:15:43Z

2024-05-09



Abstract

Colorectal cancer; Immunotherapy; Solid tumour


Cáncer colorrectal; Inmunoterapia; Tumor sólido


Càncer colorectal; Immunoteràpia; Tumor sòlid


Objective The arginase inhibitor INCB001158 was evaluated for safety (primary endpoint) in locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours; pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy were also assessed. Methods and analysis In this non-randomised, open-label, three-part phase 1 study, INCB001158 was orally administered two times per day as monotherapy or in combination with intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Dose expansion was conducted in tumour-type cohorts (with or without prior anti−PD-1/PD-L1 (programmed death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1) therapy). Results A total of 107 patients received INCB001158 50–150 mg two times per day as monotherapy, and 153 patients, including 6 with moderate renal impairment, received INCB001158 50–100 mg two times per day combined with pembrolizumab. INCB001158 exposure was similar between groups (median, 56 days (monotherapy); 84 days (combination)). 49 patients (45.8%) on monotherapy and 76 (51.7%) on combination therapy experienced grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). The most common INCB001158-related AEs were fatigue (n=10/107 (9.3%)) and nausea (n=10/107 (9.3%)) with monotherapy and diarrhoea (n=24/147 (16.3%)) and fatigue (n=22/147 (15.0%)) with combination therapy. The highest response rate was seen in the anti–PD-1/PD-L1–naive combination therapy group with head/neck squamous cell carcinoma (overall response rate, 19.2%; 4/26 partial responses, 1/26 complete response). Consistent with arginase inhibition activity, plasma arginine dose-dependently increased. Arginase 1 expression in the tumour microenvironment did not correlate with response. Conclusions INCB001158 was generally well tolerated. Response rates did not exceed background for given tumour types despite demonstrable pharmacodynamic activity. Overall, the limited antitumour activity of arginase inhibition observed suggests that the role of arginine depletion in cancer is multifaceted.


This study was jointly funded by Incyte Corporation (Wilmington, Delaware, USA), Calithera Biosciences (South San Francisco, California, USA) and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

BMJ

Related items

BMJ Oncology;3(1)

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000249

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)