Effect of low climate impact vs. high climate impact inhalers for patients with asthma and COPD-a nationwide cohort analysis

Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[Bonnesen B, Eklöf J] Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark. [Biering-Sørensen T, Modin D] Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Miravitlles M] Servei de Pneumologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain. [Mathioudakis AG] North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK. Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2024-10-31T11:31:39Z

2024-10-31T11:31:39Z

2024-09-12



Resumen

Asthma; Climate impact; Pneumonia


Asma; Impacte climàtic; Pneumònia


Asma; Impacto climático; Neumonía


Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma can be treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) delivered by low climate impact inhalers (dry powder inhalers) or high climate impact inhalers (pressurized metered-dose inhalers containing potent greenhouse gasses). ICS delivered with greenhouse gasses is prescribed ubiquitously and frequent despite limited evidence of superior effect. Our aim was to examine the beneficial and harmful events of ICS delivered by low and high climate impact inhalers in patients with asthma and COPD. Methods Nationwide retrospective cohort study of Danish outpatients with asthma and COPD treated with ICS delivered by low and high climate impact inhalers. Patients were propensity score matched by the following variables; age, gender, tobacco exposure, exacerbations, dyspnoea, body mass index, pulmonary function, ICS dose and entry year. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalisation with exacerbations and all-cause mortality analysed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Of the 10,947 patients with asthma and COPD who collected ICS by low or high climate impact inhalers, 2,535 + 2,535 patients were propensity score matched to form the population for the primary analysis. We found no association between high climate impact inhalers and risk of exacerbations requiring hospitalization and all-cause mortality (HR 1.02, CI 0.92–1.12, p = 0.77), nor on pneumonia, exacerbations requiring hospitalization, all-cause mortality, or all-cause admissions. Delivery with high climate impact inhalers was associated with a slightly increased risk of exacerbations not requiring hospitalization (HR 1.10, CI 1.01–1.21, p = 0.03). Even with low lung function there was no sign of a superior effect of high climate impact inhalers. Conclusion Low climate impact inhalers were not inferior to high climate impact inhalers for any risk analysed in patients with asthma and COPD.


This study was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (No. NNF20OC0060657). Open access funding provided by Copenhagen University

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

BMC

Documentos relacionados

Respiratory Research;25

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-02942-8

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)