Relationship between updated MELD and prognosis in alcohol-associated hepatitis: Opportunities for more efficient trial design

Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[Al-Karaghouli M, Wong YJ] Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. [Ventura-Cots M, Genesca J, Vargas V] Servei d’Hepatologia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. [Bosques F] Hospital Universitario Dr Jose E. Gonzalez, Servicio de Gastroenterologia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon Monterrey, Mexico. [Brown RS] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2024-10-04T07:15:26Z

2024-10-04T07:15:26Z

2024-08



Resumen

Liver disease; Prognosis; Alcohol-associated hepatitis


Malaltia del fetge; Pronòstic; Hepatitis associada a l'alcohol


Enfermedad del hígado; Pronóstico; Hepatitis asociada al alcohol


Background: Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is associated with significant mortality. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is used to predict short-term mortality and aid in treatment decisions. MELD is frequently updated in the course of AH. However, once the most updated MELD is known, it is uncertain if previous ones still have prognostic value, which might be relevant for transplant allocation and trial design. We aimed to investigate the predictive performance of updated MELDs in a prospectively collected cohort of patients with AH by the InTeam consortium. Methods: Three hundred seven patients (with 859 MELD values within 60 d of admission) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The main endpoint was time to death or transplant up to 90 days. We used a joint model approach to assess the predictive value of updated MELDs. Results: Updated MELD measurements had a strong prognostic value for death/transplant (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.14–1.27) (p < 0.0001). Previous MELD values did not add predictive value to the most current MELD. We also showed that MELD at day 28 (MELD28) had a significant predictive value for subsequent mortality/transplant in a landmark analysis (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12–1.23). We show that the use of an ordinal scale including death, transplant, and MELD28 as a trial outcome could substantially reduce the sample size required to demonstrate short-term benefit of an intervention. Conclusion: We show that updated MELDs during the trajectory of AH predict subsequent mortality or the need for transplant. MELD28 inclusion in an ordinal outcome (together with death or transplant) could increase the efficiency of randomized controlled trials.


This study was supported by the National Institutes on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA U01AA021908). Meritxell Ventura-Cots received financial support from JR19/00015 and PI22/01770. Bernd Schnabl is supported by NIH center P30 DK120515.

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

Wolters Kluwer Health

Documentos relacionados

Hepatology Communications;8(8)

https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000495

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PE2017-2020/JR19%2F00015

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PEICTI2021-2023/PI22%2F01770

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)