Accrual and statistical power failure in published adjuvant phase III oncology trials: a comprehensive analysis from 2013 to 2023

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Villacampa G] Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), London, UK. Statistics Unit, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Dennett S, Mello E, Holton J, Lai X, Kilburn L] Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU), London, UK

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-07-02T09:58:48Z

2024-07-02T09:58:48Z

2024-06-25



Abstract

Accrual failure; Oncology; Phase III


Fallo de acumulación; Oncología; Fase III


Falla d'acumulació; Oncologia; Fase III


Background In a competitive landscape with many ongoing adjuvant randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the prevalence of trials that failed to recruit their targeted sample size and were inadequately powered is unclear. The aims of the study are (i) to determine the percentage of trials with accrual and statistical power failure and (ii) to evaluate their potential impact on the drug development process. Materials and methods A systematic review was carried out to identify adjuvant phase III oncology RCTs reported between 2013 and 2023 across all solid tumours. No restrictions were applied regarding the type of intervention or journal of publication. The percentage of trials with accrual failure and power failure was estimated as well as their association with the efficacy endpoints. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 282 RCTs met the inclusion criteria with a median sample size of 661 patients and a median accrual period of 4.3 years. Most of these studies were superiority trials (83.0%). Accrual failure was observed in 22.0% of the studies, finishing recruitment without achieving the targeted sample size. Overall, 39.7% of the studies experienced power failure, having less power than specified in the protocol at the date of the read-out. Among superiority RCTs evaluating intermediate survival endpoints, only 31.1% presented statistically significant results. Trials with power failure were less likely to present statistically significant results (37.9% versus 21.9%, P = 0.04). The association was consistent across all cancer types. In the subset of non-inferiority trials, 35.0% formally demonstrated non-inferiority of the experimental arm. Conclusions Nearly 40% of adjuvant phase III RCTs experienced power failure, and the reduction in power significantly impacted the final study results. There is a need for procedural refinements in the design and implementation of future adjuvant RCTs to mitigate these fallacies.


This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator Award [grant number NF-SI-0616-10107]. ICR-CTSU also receives programme grant funding from Cancer Research UK [grant number C1491/A25351]. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. The funding source did not have a role in the writing or decision to submit for publication. All authors have full access to the full data in the study and accept responsibility to submit for publication.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

ESMO Open;9(7)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103603

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)