Goodbye Hartmann trial: a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study on the current use of a surgical procedure developed a century ago

Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[Perrone G, Livrini M, Petracca GL] Department of Emergency Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy. [Giuffrida M] General Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy. Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy. [Abu Zidan F] Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. [Kruger VF] Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. [Pellino G, Moratal Cloquell M, García Moller E] Unitat de Cirurgia de Còlon i Recte, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2024-04-23T07:15:36Z

2024-04-23T07:15:36Z

2024-04-16



Resumen

Colorectal cancer; Emergency surgery; Hartmann’s procedure


Càncer de colorectal; Cirurgia d'urgència; Procediment de Hartmann


Cáncer colorrectal; Cirugía de emergencia; Procedimiento de Hartmann


Background Literature suggests colonic resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) instead of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) for the treatment of left-sided colonic emergencies. We aim to evaluate the surgical options globally used to treat patients with acute left-sided colonic emergencies and the factors that leading to the choice of treatment, comparing HP and RPA. Methods This is a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. A total 1215 patients with left-sided colonic emergencies who required surgery were included from 204 centers during the period of March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020. with a 1-year follow-up. Results 564 patients (43.1%) were females. The mean age was 65.9 ± 15.6 years. HP was performed in 697 (57.3%) patients and RPA in 384 (31.6%) cases. Complicated acute diverticulitis was the most common cause of left-sided colonic emergencies (40.2%), followed by colorectal malignancy (36.6%). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) were higher in the HP group (P < 0.001). 30-day mortality was higher in HP patients (13.7%), especially in case of bowel perforation and diffused peritonitis. 1-year follow-up showed no differences on ostomy reversal rate between HP and RPA. (P = 0.127). A backward likelihood logistic regression model showed that RPA was preferred in younger patients, having low ASA score (≤ 3), in case of large bowel obstruction, absence of colonic ischemia, longer time from admission to surgery, operating early at the day working hours, by a surgeon who performed more than 50 colorectal resections. Conclusions After 100 years since the first Hartmann’s procedure, HP remains the most common treatment for left-sided colorectal emergencies. Treatment’s choice depends on patient characteristics, the time of surgery and the experience of the surgeon. RPA should be considered as the gold standard for surgery, with HP being an exception.

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

BMC

Documentos relacionados

World Journal of Emergency Surgery;19(1)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00543-w

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)