Ocrelizumab exposure in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: 10-year analysis of the phase 2 randomized clinical trial and its extension

Otros/as autores/as

Institut Català de la Salut

[Kappos L] Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. [Traboulsee A] Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. [Li DKB] Department of Radiology and Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. [Bar Or A] Center for Neuroinfammation and Experimental Therapeutics, and Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. [Barkhof F] VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. UCL Institutes of Biomedical Engineering and Neurology, London, UK. [Montalban X] Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (CEMCAT), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Fecha de publicación

2024-02-01T13:28:45Z

2024-02-01T13:28:45Z

2024-02

Resumen

Disease-modifying therapies; Multiple sclerosis; Ocrelizumab


Terapias modificadoras de la enfermedad; Esclerosis múltiple; Ocrelizumab


Teràpies modificadores de la malaltia; Esclerosi múltiple; Ocrelizumab


Open-label extension (OLE) studies help inform long-term safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS). We report exploratory analyses from a phase 2 trial on the longest follow-up to date of ocrelizumab-treated patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS). The primary treatment period (PTP) comprised four 24-week treatment cycles; participants were randomized to double-blind ocrelizumab (2000 mg or 600 mg), placebo, or interferon β-1a (open label) for one cycle, then dose-blinded ocrelizumab 1000 mg or 600 mg for the remaining cycles. The PTP was followed by consecutive assessed and unassessed treatment-free periods (TFPs) and then the OLE (ocrelizumab 600 mg every 24 weeks). Safety and efficacy were prospectively assessed. Of 220 participants randomized, 183 (84%) completed the PTP. After the TFP, 103 entered OLE (median OLE ocrelizumab exposure 6.5 years). Most common adverse events across all periods were infusion-related reactions. MRI activity, annualized relapse rate, and confirmed disability progression (CDP) rates remained low throughout. During the assessed TFP, there was a trend toward less and later B-cell repletion, and later CDP, for patients randomized to ocrelizumab; MRI activity was observed in 16.3% of patients, the earliest 24 weeks after the last ocrelizumab dose. This is the longest follow-up of ocrelizumab-treated patients with RRMS, with no new safety signals emerging during an observation period from 2008 to 2020. Results reinforce the sustained efficacy of long-term ocrelizumab. Reduced disease activity was maintained following interruption of 6-month dosing cycles, with no evidence of rebound.


This research was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland. Editorial assistance for this article was provided by Nicholas Fitch and Martha Hoque of Articulate Science, UK, and funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. The authors had full editorial control of the manuscript and provided their final approval of all content.

Tipo de documento

Artículo


Versión publicada

Lengua

Inglés

Publicado por

Springer

Documentos relacionados

Journal of Neurology;271

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11943-4

Citación recomendada

Esta citación se ha generado automáticamente.

Derechos

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)