Patient-reported outcomes and tolerability in patients receiving ripretinib versus sunitinib after treatment with imatinib in INTRIGUE, a phase 3, open-label study

Altres autors/es

Institut Català de la Salut

[Gelderblom H] Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. [Jones RL] Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. [Blay JY] Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France. [George S] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. [von Mehren M] Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. [Zalcberg JR] Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health and School of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. [Serrano C] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Data de publicació

2023-08-31T09:17:02Z

2023-08-31T09:17:02Z

2023-07-20



Resum

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours; Patient reported outcome measures; Protein kinase inhibitors


Tumores del estroma gastrointestinal; Medidas de resultado informadas por el paciente; Inhibidores de proteína quinasa


Tumors de l'estroma gastrointestinal; Mesures de resultat informades pel pacient; Inhibidors de la proteïna cinasa


Purpose In the INTRIGUE trial, ripretinib showed no significant difference versus sunitinib in progression-free survival for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) previously treated with imatinib. We compared the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients and methods Patients were randomised 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at day (D)1, and D29 of all cycles until treatment discontinuation. Change from baseline was calculated. Time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) was estimated as the mean number of days without progression, death, or grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events per patient over 1 year of follow-up. Results Questionnaire completion at baseline was 88.1% (199/226) for ripretinib and 87.7% (199/227) for sunitinib and remained high for enrolled patients throughout treatment. Patients receiving sunitinib demonstrated within-cycle variation in self-reported HRQoL, corresponding to the on/off dosing regimen. Patients receiving ripretinib reported better HRQoL at D29 assessments than patients receiving sunitinib on all scales except constipation. HRQoL was similar between treatments at D1 assessments, following 2 weeks without treatment for sunitinib patients. TWiST was greater for ripretinib patients (173 versus 126 days). Conclusion Patients receiving ripretinib experienced better HRQoL than patients receiving sunitinib during the dosing period and similar HRQoL to patients who had not received sunitinib for 2 weeks for all QLQ-C30 domains except constipation. Ripretinib may provide clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib.


This study was sponsored by Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC. This article was based on the original study INTRIGUE (NCT03673501) sponsored by Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC. Support for third-party writing assistance for this article, provided by Hannah L Fox, PhD, and Alex Emerson, BA, of Costello Medical, Boston, MA, USA, was funded by Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP) 2022 guidelines (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022).

Tipus de document

Article


Versió publicada

Llengua

Anglès

Publicat per

Elsevier

Documents relacionats

European Journal of Cancer;192

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113245

Citació recomanada

Aquesta citació s'ha generat automàticament.

Drets

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)