A Better Look at Learning: How Does the Brain Express the Mind?

dc.contributor.author
Pérez Álvarez, Frederic
dc.contributor.author
Perez-Serra, Alexandra
dc.contributor.author
Timoneda Gallart, Carme
dc.date.accessioned
2024-06-18T12:03:13Z
dc.date.available
2024-06-18T12:03:13Z
dc.date.issued
2013-10
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/16792
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/16792
dc.description.abstract
Learning problems in the light of PASS assessment and intervention were studied. Data for 248 subjects with specific learning impairment (SLI), dyslexia, dyscalculia, and non-defined learning difficulty were studied. Hierarchical cluster analysis of PASS scores at baseline was performed. PASS re-assessment was carried out at 6 and 12 months after 6-month period of intervention. Four statistically different cluster groups were identified. All groups, except one, showed cognitive weakness. Planning weakness, associated with other weakness, appears involved in all groups except two where isolated planning and successive weaknesses were identified, respectively. SLI, dyslexia, and dyscalculia are not homogenous entities. A kind of dyslexia is clearly linked to isolated successive weakness. SLI-expressive (SLIe) and a minority of both dyslexia and dyscalculia appear linked to successive weakness although associated with planning and additionally with attention in the case of SLIe. SLI-expressive-receptive (SLIe-r) and Dyscalculia appear linked to simultaneous weakness, although associated with planning weakness. Other kind of SLIe-r appears linked to isolated planning weakness. Other types of SLIe-r and Dyscalculia appear liked to combined planning + successive + attention weakness. Isolated dysfunctional attention does not appear in any case. After 6 months of intervention, planning improves statistically in all cases. Attention improves in few cases. Successive and simultaneous do not improve. The best result is in dyslexia, SLIe and a minority of Dyscalculia. The worst result is in those without cognitive deficiency. The effect of intervention at 6 months remains with minor changes at 12 months after 6 months without intervention
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Scientific Research Publishing
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4236/psych.2013.410108
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2152-7180
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2152-7199
dc.rights
Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Psychology, 2013, vol.4, núm.10, p. 760-770
dc.source
Articles publicats (D-P)
dc.subject
Trastorns de l'aprenentatge
dc.subject
Learning disabilities
dc.subject
Trastorns de la cognició
dc.subject
Cognition disorders
dc.title
A Better Look at Learning: How Does the Brain Express the Mind?
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type
peer-reviewed


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)