To access the full text documents, please follow this link: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2609
dc.contributor.author | Puglisi, Rosario |
---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Santos, Antonio |
dc.contributor.author | Pujol, Angels |
dc.contributor.author | Ferrari, Marco |
dc.contributor.author | Nart Molina, José |
dc.contributor.author | Pascual La Rocca, Andres Matteo |
dc.date | 2021-06-08T17:01:20Z |
dc.date | 2021-06-08T17:01:20Z |
dc.date | 2021-05 |
dc.identifier | Puglisi, Rosario; Santos, Antonio; Pujol, Angels [et al.]. Clinical comparison of instrumentation systems for periodontal debridement: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 2021, [p. 1-34]. Disponible en: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/idh.12520>. Fecha de acceso: 8 jun. 2021. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12520 |
dc.identifier | 1601-5029 |
dc.identifier | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12520 |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/2609 |
dc.description | Objective: To compare clinical efficacy, chairside time, and post-treatment hypersensitivity of four instruments used for subgingival periodontal debridement. Materials & Methods: Seventeen patients with stage II and III periodontitis were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial using a split-mouth design. Quadrants were randomly divided into four treatment groups: Group A: Gracey curettes-Hu-Friedy®; Group B: piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®) with No.1S insert; Group C: diamond burs 40µm (Intensiv Perioset®); and Group D: piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) with PP1 insert. Clinical outcomes, chairside time, and hypersensitivity were assessed at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment. The primary outcome variable was improvement in clinical attachment level. Results: At 8 weeks post-treatment, Gracey curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®), and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) were statistically more effective than diamond burs in increasing attachment level and reducing probing pocket depth. Comparison of piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®) and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) with the other instruments showed a statistical difference (p<0.001) in chairside time. Regarding post-treatment hypersensitivity, no statistical differences were observed in any of the groups. Conclusions: Gracey curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic (Satelec®), and piezosurgery ultrasonic (Mectron®) were clinically more effective than diamond burs 40 µm. The ultrasonic instruments showed a significant reduction in chairside time. |
dc.format | 34 |
dc.format | application/pdf |
dc.language | eng |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons |
dc.relation | International Journal of Dental Hygiene |
dc.rights | © 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject | Teràpia periodontal no quirúrgica |
dc.subject | Descamació |
dc.subject | Desbridament subgingival |
dc.subject | Curetes periodontals |
dc.subject | Ultrasons |
dc.subject | Piezoquirurgia |
dc.subject | Terapia periodontal no quirúrgica |
dc.subject | Raspado |
dc.subject | Desbridamiento subgingival |
dc.subject | Curetas periodontales |
dc.subject | Ultrasonidos |
dc.subject | Piezocirugía |
dc.subject | Non-surgical periodontal therapy |
dc.subject | Scaling |
dc.subject | Subgingival debridement |
dc.subject | Periodontal curettes |
dc.subject | Ultrasonic |
dc.subject | Piezosurgery |
dc.subject | 616.3 |
dc.title | Clinical comparison of instrumentation systems for periodontal debridement: a randomized clinical trial |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |