To access the full text documents, please follow this link: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1427

Cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase screening coverage for cervical cancer in Spain: the CRIVERVA study
Trapero Bertran, Marta; Acera Pérez, Amelia; De Sanjosé, Silvia; Manresa Domínguez, Josep Maria; Rodríguez Capriles, Diego; Rodríguez Martínez, Ana; Bonet Simó, Josep Maria; Sánchez Sánchez, Norman; Hidalgo Valls, Pablo; Díaz Sanchis, Mireia
Background The aim of the study is to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis of three different interventions to promote the uptake of screening for cervical cancer in general practice in the county of Valles Occidental, Barcelona, Spain. Methods Women aged from 30 to 70 years (n = 15,965) were asked to attend a general practice to be screened. They were randomly allocated to one of four groups: no intervention group (NIG); one group where women received an invitation letter to participate in the screening (IG1); one group where women received an invitation letter and informative leaflet (IG2); and one group where women received an invitation letter, an informative leaflet and a phone call reminder (IG3). Clinical effectiveness was measured as the percentage increase in screening coverage. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the perspective of the public health system with a time horizon of three to five years – the duration of the randomised controlled clinical trial. In addition, a deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results are presented according to different age groups. Results The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the most cost-effective intervention, IG1, compared with opportunistic screening was € 2.78 per 1% increase in the screening coverage. The age interval with the worst results in terms of efficiency was women aged < 40 years. Conclusions In a population like Catalonia, with around 2 million women aged 30 to 70 years and assuming that 40% of these women were not attending general practice to be screened for cervical cancer, the implementation of an intervention to increase screening coverage which consists of sending a letter would cost on average less than € 490 for every 1000 women.
-Cost-eficàcia
-Cost effectiveness
-Càncer
-Cancer
-Cáncer
-338
-61
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Article
Article - Accepted version
BMC
         

Show full item record

Related documents

Other documents of the same author

Acera Pérez, Amelia; Manresa Domínguez, Josep Maria; Rodríguez Capriles, Diego; Rodríguez Martínez, Ana; Bonet Simó, Josep Maria; Trapero Bertrán, Marta; Hidalgo Valls, Pablo; Sánchez Sánchez, Norman; de Sanjosé, Silvia
Trapero Bertrán, Marta; Acera Pérez, Amelia; de Sanjose, Silvia; Manresa, J. M; Rodríguez Capriles, Diego; Rodríguez Martínez, Ana; Bonet Simó, Josep Maria; Sánchez Sánchez, Norman; Hidalgo Valls, Pablo; Díaz Sanchís, Mireia
Acera Pérez, Amelia; Manresa, J. M; Rodríguez Capriles, Diego; Rodríguez Martínez, Ana; Bonet Simó, Josep Maria; Trapero Bertrán, Marta; Hidalgo Valls, Pablo; Sánchez Sánchez, Norman; de Sanjose, Silvia
Acera Pérez, Amelia; Manresa, Josep Maria; Rodríguez, Diego A.; Rodriguez, Ana; Bonet Simó, Josep Maria; Sánchez, Norman; Hidalgo Valls, Pablo; Soteras, Pilar; Torán-Monserrat, Pere; Trapero Bertran, Marta; Lozano, Iris; De Sanjosé, Silvia
Acera Pérez, Amelia; Manresa, Josep Maria; Rodriguez, Diego; Rodriguez, Ana; Bonet Simó, Josep Maria; Trapero Bertran, Marta; Hidalgo Valls, Pablo; Sànchez, Norman; De Sanjosé, Silvia
 

Coordination

 

Supporters