Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study

Home | About RECERCAT | Contact

Català | Castellano

All of RECERCAT

By Communities &
Collections By Defense Date By Authors By Titles By Subject

This Collection

By Defense Date By Authors By Titles By Subject

Statistics

View Statistics All RECERCAT

My RECERCAT

Other repositories directory

RECERCAT Home > Universitat Internacional de Catalunya > Recerca > Articles > Ciències de la Salut > View document

To access the full text documents, please follow this link: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1252

dc.contributor.author	Velasco Ortega, Eugenio
dc.contributor.author	Ortiz García, Ivan
dc.contributor.author	Jiménez Guerra, Álvaro
dc.contributor.author	Mosalve Guil, Loreto
dc.contributor.author	Muñoz Guzón, Fernando
dc.contributor.author	A. Pérez, Román
dc.contributor.author	Gil Mur, Javier
dc.date	2019-10-06T17:21:42Z
dc.date	2019-10-06T17:21:42Z
dc.date	2019-07-03
dc.identifier	Velasco-Ortega, E., Ortiz-García, I., Jiménez-Guerra, A., Monsalve-Guil, L., Muñoz-Guzón, F., Perez, R. A., & Gil, F. J. (2019). «Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study». International journal of molecular sciences, 20(13), 3267. doi:10.3390/ijms20133267
dc.identifier	10.3390/ijms20133267
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/1252
dc.description	The surface modifications of titanium dental implants play important roles in the enhancement of osseointegration. The objective of the present study was to test two different implant surface treatments on a rabbit model to investigate the osseointegration. The tested surfaces were: a) acid-etched surface with sandblasting treatment (SA) and b) an oxidized implant surface (OS). The roughness was measured by an interferometeric microscope with white light and the residual stress of the surfaces was measured with X-ray residual stress Bragg–Bentano diffraction. Six New Zealand white rabbits were used for the in vivo study. Implants with the two different surfaces (SA and OS) were inserted in the femoral bone. After 12 weeks of implantation, histological and histomorphometric analyses of the blocks containing the implants and the surrounding bone were performed. All the implants were correctly implanted and no signs of infection were observed. SA and OS surfaces were both surrounded by newly formed trabeculae. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the bone–implant contact % (BIC) was higher around the SA implants (53.49 ± 8.46) than around the OS implants (50.94 ± 16.42), although there were no significant statistical differences among them. Both implant surfaces (SA and OS) demonstrated a good bone response with significant amounts of newly formed bone along the implant surface after 12 weeks of implantation. These results confirmed the importance of the topography and physico–chemical properties of dental implants in the osseointegration.
dc.description	postprint
dc.format	10
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	International Journal of Molecular Sciences
dc.rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject	osseointegration
dc.subject	osseointegració
dc.subject	osseointegración
dc.subject	implant surface
dc.subject	superfície d’implant
dc.subject	superficie de implante
dc.subject	titanium
dc.subject	titanio
dc.subject	titani
dc.subject	616.3
dc.title	Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article

Show simple item record

All of RECERCAT

This Collection

Statistics

My RECERCAT

Related documents

Other documents of the same author