dc.contributor.author
López-Guillén, Eduard
dc.contributor.author
Ibáñez Cortina, Neus
dc.contributor.author
Nualart, Neus
dc.contributor.author
López-Pujol, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned
2024-02-29T08:52:32Z
dc.date.accessioned
2024-07-31T10:01:23Z
dc.date.available
2024-02-29T08:52:32Z
dc.date.available
2024-07-31T10:01:23Z
dc.date.issued
2024-01-09
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2072/537236
dc.description.abstract
iNaturalist defines itself as an “online social network of people sharing biodiversity
information to help each other learn about nature” and it is likely one of the largest citizen science
web portals in the world, as every year millions of observations across thousands of species are
gathered and collectively compiled by an engaged community of nearly 3 million users (November
2023). The strengths and potentialities that explain the success of the platform are reviewed and
include, among others, its usability and low technical requirements, immediacy, open-access, the
possibility of interacting with other users, artificial-intelligence-aided identification, versatility and
automatic incorporation of the validated records to GBIF. iNaturalist has, however, features that
scientists need to carefully consider when using it for their research, making sure that the quality of
observations does not limit or hinder its usefulness in plant research. While these are identified (e.g.,
the lack of representative photographs for many observations or the relatively frequent identification
errors), we provide some suggestions to overcome them and, by doing so, improve the use and add
value to iNaturalist for plant research.
eng
dc.relation.ispartof
Diversity, vol.16, núm. 42 (2024)
dc.source
RECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya)
dc.subject.other
Ciència ciutadana
dc.subject.other
Plantes introduïdes
dc.subject.other
Biologia de la conservació
dc.subject.other
Flora amenaçada
dc.subject.other
Seguiment biològic
dc.title
Strengths and challenges of using iNaturalist in plant research with focus on data quality
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
https://doi.org/10.3390/d16010042
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess