Triticum timopheevii s.l. (‘new glume wheat’) finds in regions of southern and eastern Europe across space and time

Author

Filipović, Dragana

Jones, Glynis

Kirleis, Wiebke

Bogaard, Amy

Ballantyne, Rachel

Charles, Michael

Vareilles, Anne de

Ergun, Müge

Gkatzogia, Eugenia

Holguin, Amy

Hristova, Ivanka

Karathanou, Angeliki

Kapcia, Magda

Knežić, Dolores

Kotzamani, Georgia

Lathiras, Pavlos

Livarda, Alexandra

Marinova, Elena

Michou, Stavroula

Mosulishvili, Marine

Mueller-Bieniek, Aldona

Obradović, Djurdja

Padgett, Matthew

Paraskevopoulou, Pelagia

Petridou, Chryssi

Stylianakou, Haroula

Zerl, Tanja

Vidas, Doris

Valamoti, Soultana Maria

Publication date

2023-10-12



Abstract

Triticum timopheevii sensu lato (‘new glume wheat’, NGW) was first recognised as a distinct prehistoric cereal crop through work on archaeobotanical finds from Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in northern Greece. This was later followed by its identification in archaeobotanical assemblages from other parts of Europe. This paper provides an overview of the currently known archaeobotanical finds of Timopheev’s wheat in southeastern and eastern Europe and observes their temporal span and spatial distribution. To date, there are 89 prehistoric sites with these finds, located in different parts of the study region and dated from the Neolithic to the very late Iron Age. Their latest recorded presence in the region is in the last centuries BCE. For assemblages from the site as a whole containing at least 30 grain and/or chaff remains of Timopheev’s wheat, we take a brief look at the overall relative proportions of Triticum monococcum (einkorn), T. dicoccum (emmer) and T. timopheevii s.l. (Timopheev’s wheat), the three most common glume wheats in our study region in prehistory. We highlight several sites where the overall proportions of Timopheev’s wheat might be taken to suggest it was a minor component of a mixed crop (maslin), or an unmonitored inclusion in einkorn or emmer fields. At the same sites, however, there are also discrete contexts where this wheat is strongly predominant, pointing to its cultivation as a pure crop. We therefore emphasise the need to evaluate the relative representation of Timopheev’s wheat at the level of individual samples or contexts before making inferences on its cultivation status. We also encourage re-examination of prehistoric and historic cereal assemblages for its remains.

Document Type

Article
Published version

Language

English

CDU Subject

8 - language. Linguistics. Literature

Subject

Restes de plantes (Arqueologia) -- Europa; Aliments -- Europa; Europa -- Arqueologia

Pages

14 p.

Publisher

Springer Nature

Version of

Veget Hist Archaeobot 33, 195–208 (2024)

Documents

2023_triticum_timopheevii_sl_new_glume_wheat.pdf

2.685Mb

 

Rights

© The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

© The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This item appears in the following Collection(s)