dc.contributor.author
Hyafil, A.
dc.contributor.author
de la Rocha, J.
dc.contributor.author
Pericas, C.
dc.contributor.author
Katz, L.N.
dc.contributor.author
Huk, A.C.
dc.contributor.author
Pillow, J.W.
dc.date.accessioned
2023-06-21T10:39:55Z
dc.date.accessioned
2024-09-19T14:25:28Z
dc.date.available
2023-06-21T10:39:55Z
dc.date.available
2024-09-19T14:25:28Z
dc.date.issued
2023-05-04
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/2072/535450
dc.description.abstract
Making informed decisions in noisy environments requires integrating sensory information over time. However, recent work has suggested that it may be difficult to determine whether an animal's decision-making strategy relies on evidence integration or not. In particular, strategies based on extrema-detection or random snapshots of the evidence stream may be difficult or even impossible to distinguish from classic evidence integration. Moreover, such non-integration strategies might be surprisingly common in experiments that aimed to study decisions based on integration. To determine whether temporal integration is central to perceptual decision-making, we developed a new model-based approach for comparing temporal integration against alternative 'non-integration' strategies for tasks in which the sensory signal is composed of discrete stimulus samples. We applied these methods to behavioral data from monkeys, rats, and humans performing a variety of sensory decision-making tasks. In all species and tasks, we found converging evidence in favor of temporal integration. First, in all observers across studies, the integration model better accounted for standard behavioral statistics such as psychometric curves and psychophysical kernels. Second, we found that sensory samples with large evidence do not contribute disproportionately to subject choices, as predicted by an extrema-detection strategy. Finally, we provide a direct confirmation of temporal integration by showing that the sum of both early and late evidence contributed to observer decisions. Overall, our results provide experimental evidence suggesting that temporal integration is an ubiquitous feature in mammalian perceptual decision-making. Our study also highlights the benefits of using experimental paradigms where the temporal stream of sensory evidence is controlled explicitly by the experimenter, and known precisely by the analyst, to characterize the temporal properties of the decision process.
eng
dc.description.sponsorship
This work also acknowledges the CERCA Programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support. This work was also supported by the Spanish State Research Agency, through the Severo Ochoa and Maria de Maeztu Program for Centres and Units of Excellence in R&D (CEX2020-001084-M).
dc.format.extent
25 p.
cat
dc.relation.ispartof
NLM (Medline)
cat
dc.rights
L'accés als continguts d'aquest document queda condicionat a l'acceptació de les condicions d'ús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source
RECERCAT (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya)
dc.subject.other
accumulation of evidence; decision-making; human; motion perception; neuroscience; rat; rhesus macaque
cat
dc.title
Temporal integration is a robust feature of perceptual decisions
cat
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
cat
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
cat
dc.identifier.doi
10.7554/eLife.84045
cat
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess