dc.contributor
Universitat Ramon Llull. Esade
dc.contributor.author
Navarro, Jose
dc.contributor.author
Rueff, Rita
dc.contributor.author
Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe
dc.date.accessioned
2026-02-19T14:12:45Z
dc.date.available
2026-02-19T14:12:45Z
dc.identifier.issn
1359-432X
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5160
dc.description.abstract
Within-person analysis of data from longitudinal designs has become popular in the field. However, important characteristics of the design can influence that variability. In this paper, we examine how the number of measurement points obtained per participant influences in the within-person variance in work motivation. Using two sources of evidence (a systematic review and an empirical study) we show how the number of assessments substantially influences the amount of within-person variance reaching values of 52%-54% of total variance. We found that a minimum of 25-30 measurement points per participant is required to be rigorous.
dc.publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartof
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Within-participant variance
dc.title
Studying Within-Person Changes in Work Motivation in the Short and MediumTerm: You Will Likely Need More Measurement Points than You Think!
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.description.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
http://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2022a1
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess