Risk Factors for COVID-19 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A National, ENEIDA-Based Case-Control Study (COVID-19-EII)

Other authors

[Zabana Y] Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain. [Marín-Jiménez I] Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. [Rodríguez-Lago I] Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Galdakao, Galdakao, Spain. Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Galdakao, Spain. [Vera I] Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain. [Martín-Arranz MD] Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. [Guerra I] Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPaz), Madrid, Spain. [Piqueras M, Mena R] Servei de Digestologia, Hospital de Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain

Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Publication date

2023-06-29T12:24:52Z

2023-06-29T12:24:52Z

2022-12-19



Abstract

COVID-19; Immunosuppression; Inflammatory bowel disease


COVID-19; Immunosupressió; Malaltia inflamatòria intestinal


COVID-19; Inmunosupresión; Enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal


(1) Scant information is available concerning the characteristics that may favour the acquisition of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess these differences between infected and noninfected patients with IBD. (2) This nationwide case−control study evaluated patients with inflammatory bowel disease with COVID-19 (cases) and without COVID-19 (controls) during the period March−July 2020 included in the ENEIDA of GETECCU. (3) A total of 496 cases and 964 controls from 73 Spanish centres were included. No differences were found in the basal characteristics between cases and controls. Cases had higher comorbidity Charlson scores (24% vs. 19%; p = 0.02) and occupational risk (28% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.0001) more frequently than did controls. Lockdown was the only protective measure against COVID-19 (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.0001). No differences were found in the use of systemic steroids, immunosuppressants or biologics between cases and controls. Cases were more often treated with 5-aminosalicylates (42% vs. 34%; p = 0.003). Having a moderate Charlson score (OR: 2.7; 95%CI: 1.3−5.9), occupational risk (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.8−4.4) and the use of 5-aminosalicylates (OR: 1.7; 95%CI: 1.2−2.5) were factors for COVID-19. The strict lockdown was the only protective factor (OR: 0.1; 95%CI: 0.09−0.2). (4) Comorbidities and occupational exposure are the most relevant factors for COVID-19 in patients with IBD. The risk of COVID-19 seems not to be increased by immunosuppressants or biologics, with a potential effect of 5-aminosalicylates, which should be investigated further and interpreted with caution.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

MDPI

Related items

Journal of Clinical Medicine;11(24)

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247540

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)