Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Nebulized Colistimethate Sodium Using Two Different Types of Nebulizers in Critically Ill Patients with Ventilator-Associated Respiratory Infections

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Kyriakoudi A, Pontikis K, Avgeropoulou S] Intensive Care Unit, 1st Department of Pulmonology, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital for the Diseases of the Chest “I Sotiria”, Athens, Greece. [Valsami G, Neroutsos E, Christodoulou E] Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. [Rello J] Grup de Recerca Clínica/Innovació en la Pneumònia i Sèpsia (CRIPS), Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Clinical Research, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-01-09T12:23:00Z

2023-01-09T12:23:00Z

2022-11-01



Abstract

Colistin pharmacokinetics; Critically ill; Inhaled colistin


Farmacocinética de la colistina; Enfermo crítico; Colistina inhalada


Farmacocinètica de la colistina; Malalt crític; Colistina inhalada


Background: Rising antimicrobial resistance has led to a revived interest in inhaled colistin treatment in the critically ill patient with ventilator-associated respiratory infection (VARI). Nebulization via vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMNs) is considered the current standard-of-care, yet the use of generic jet nebulizers (JNs) is more widespread. Few data exist on the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of colistin when administered through VMNs, while there is a complete paucity regarding the use of JNs. Methods: In this study, 18 VARI patients who received 2 million international units of inhaled colistimethate sodium (CMS) through a VMN were pharmacokinetically compared with six VARI patients who received the same drug dose through a JN, in the absence of systemic CMS administration. Results: Surprisingly, VMN and JN led to comparable formed colistin exposures in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) (median (IQR) AUC0–24: 86.2 (46.0–185.9) mg/L∙h with VMN and 91.5 (78.1–110.3) mg/L∙h with JN). The maximum ELF concentration was 10.4 (4.7–22.6) mg/L and 7.4 (6.2–10.3) mg/L, respectively. Conclusions: Based on our results, JN might be considered a viable alternative to the theoretically superior VMN. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the ELF can be advised due to the observed low exposure, high variability, and appreciable systemic absorption.


This research was funded by Norma Hellas S.A., grant number 06797/2017, managed by the Special Research Account of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (ELKE).

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

MDPI

Related items

Antibiotics;11

https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111528

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)