An observational, multicentre study of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel (CAPRISTANA)

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Carles J] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Pichler A] Department of Hematology and Oncology, Landeskrankenhaus Hochsteiermark, Leoben, Austria. [Korunkova H] Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital, Plzen, Czech Republic. [Tomova A] Department of Oncology, Complex Oncology Center, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. [Ghosn M, El Karak F] Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hotel Dieu de France University Hospital, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2021-03-11T14:42:37Z

2021-03-11T14:42:37Z

2018

2019-03-01



Abstract

Càncer de pròstata resistent a la castració metastàsica; Cabazitaxel; Qualitat de vida relacionada amb la salut


Cáncer de próstata metastásico resistente a la castración; Cabazitaxel; Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud


Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; Cabazitaxel; Health-related quality of life


Objectives To obtain routine clinical practice data on cabazitaxel usage patterns for patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and to describe physician‐assessed cabazitaxel effectiveness, health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and safety. Patients and Methods CAPRISTANA was an international, observational cohort study examining cabazitaxel use for the treatment of patients with mCRPC. Effectiveness was assessed by overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF) and disease control rate. HRQoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Prostate questionnaire (FACT‐P) and the three‐level European Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ‐5D‐3L). Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting. Results A total of 189 patients were treated across 54 centres between April 2012 and June 2016. At baseline, 58.7% had ≥1 comorbidity, 93.7% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, and 60.1% had a Gleason score at diagnosis of ≥8. Patients received a median of 6 cabazitaxel cycles; 84.7% received cabazitaxel as second‐line therapy. The median OS, PFS and TTF were 13.2, 5.6 and 4.4 months, respectively. Cabazitaxel led to disease control in 52.9% of patients. HRQoL was maintained (40.3%) or improved (32.2%) in 72.5% of patients based on total FACT‐P scores. Interestingly, 53.6% of patients reported pain improvement and a further 21.2% maintained pain control based on FACT‐P prostate cancer‐specific pain scores. The most common treatment‐related grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (7.9%) and anaemia (2.1%). Conclusion Patients in CAPRISTANA treated with cabazitaxel had similar disease outcomes and safety profiles compared with large phase III clinical trials. Most patients had maintained or improved HRQoL scores; >70% of patients had maintained or improved pain control.


Research and analysis was supported by Sanofi. The authors were responsible for all content and editorial decisions, and received no honoraria for development of this manuscript. Editorial support was provided by Amber Wood and Anna Longjaloux of MediTech Media, funded by Sanofi. The authors would also like to thank Teri Michelini of Sanofi for support in preparing this manuscript.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Wiley

Related items

BJU International;123(3)

https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.14509

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)