eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation: an international consensus study

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Kraaijkamp JJM, Achterberg WP] Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. University Network for the Care Sector Zuid-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. [Persoon A] Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [Chavannes NH] Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, The Netherlands. [Choukou MA] Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Centre on Aging, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. [Dockery F] Beaumont Hospital & Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. [Pérez LM] Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili, Barcelona, Spain. grup de Recerca en Envelliment, Fragilitat i Transicions a Barcelona, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-10-14T08:14:19Z

2025-10-14T08:14:19Z

2025-06



Abstract

Consensus; Geriatric rehabilitation; eHealth


Consenso; Rehabilitación geriátrica; eSalud


Consens; Rehabilitació geriàtrica; eSalut


Purpose: Current evidence on the use of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation is limited. This aim of this study was to achieve international consensus on three key eHealth-related topics in geriatric rehabilitation: the use, domains, and scientific evaluation of eHealth. Additionally, we developed a model that provides insight into the use of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation. Methods: An international, two-round Delphi study was conducted. Two models served as a framework for the initial statement draft, with a total of 28 statements based on our systematic review results, an international survey, and expert opinion. Eligible healthcare professionals working in geriatric rehabilitation facilities were recruited across 10 countries. Results: Eighty healthcare professionals participated in round one and 47 in round two. In the first round, consensus was obtained for 20 of the 28 statements (71%). Prior to round two, four statements were revised, two statements were combined, and one statement was removed. In round two, consensus was obtained on six statements, bringing the total to 26: three related to the use of eHealth, five to the domains of eHealth, and 18 related to the scientific evaluation of eHealth. Conclusion: International consensus has been reached on the use, domains, and scientific evaluation of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation. This first step in generating reliable knowledge and understandable information will help promote a consistent approach to the development, implementation, and scientific evaluation of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

European Geriatric Medicine;16

https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01170-7

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)