The Effect of Probiotics on Preterm Birth Rates in Pregnant Women After a Threatened Preterm Birth Episode (The PROPEV Trial)

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[del Barco E, Dalmau M, Casellas A, Carreras E, Goya M] Unitat de Medicina Materna i Fetal, Servei d’Obstetrícia, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Molano LAG, Soler Z, Manichanh C] Microbiome Lab, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. [Vargas M] Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Althaia, Manresa, Spain. [Miserachs M] Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. [Puerto L] High-Risk Obstetrics Unit, Obstetrics Department, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain. [Garrido-Giménez C] Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. Women and Perinatal Health Research Group, IR SANT PAU, RICORS-SAMID Network (RD21/0012), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-08-06T06:34:45Z

2025-08-06T06:34:45Z

2025-05



Abstract

Microbiota; Preterm birth; Probiotics


Microbiota; Parto prematuro; Probióticos


Microbiota; Part prematur; Probiòtics


Introduction: Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal mortality worldwide, with prevalence rates showing little reduction. Although mortality rates have decreased, morbidity rates remain concerningly high. In recent years, there has been a surge in studies examining the etiology, risk factors, and management of preterm birth. The use of vaginal probiotics in pregnant women at risk of preterm birth has garnered attention as a potential approach for improving perinatal outcomes and modulating the vaginal microbiota. However, the efficacy of this intervention remains unclear. Therefore, this study explored the impact of vaginal probiotics on perinatal outcomes and vaginal microbiota composition in pregnant women at risk of preterm birth. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, prospective, longitudinal, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentric trial conducted across seven maternities in Spain from October 2017 to August 2022 in pregnant women at risk of preterm birth. Participants were randomly assigned to receive vaginal probiotics containing four lactobacilli strains or a placebo. The primary outcome was to explore a potential correlation between probiotic use among pregnant women at risk of preterm birth and the actual rate of preterm birth before 37 gestational weeks. Secondary outcomes included an evaluation of preterm birth rates, neonatal morbidity, the vaginal microbiota, and changes in the vaginal microbiota after receiving probiotics. Other secondary outcomes were identifying vaginal microbiota patterns associated with preterm birth and exploring potential therapeutic mechanisms involving probiotics. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT03689166. Results: A total of 200 participants were included. Of those, birth data were obtained for 181 women. Demographics were similar between both groups. An analysis of perinatal outcomes found no significant differences in preterm birth rates, prematurity rates, gestational weeks at delivery, neonatal complications, time to birth, or latency time to delivery. Microbiota analysis showed no significant differences in vaginal microbiota changes between groups. No serious or unexpected adverse reactions were reported. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences for spontaneous preterm birth between pregnant women receiving probiotics and pregnant women receiving the placebo.


This work was supported by the Spanish Clinical Research Network (SCReN), which is funded by the ISCIII-General Subdirectorate for Evaluation and Promotion of Research through projects PT17/0017/0030 and PT20/00078. Both projects were integrated into the 2013–2016 National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), “A way of making Europe”. This work was also supported by Project FIS PI 19/00287 (Maria Goya as a principal investigator), which was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and co-funded by the European Union. Laboratorios Ordesa S.L funded the PROPEV study. L.-A.G.M. was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III/FEDER (PI20/00130).

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

MDPI

Related items

Biomedicines;13(5)

https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051141

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PE2013-2016/PT17%2F0017%2F0030

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PE2013-2016/PT20%2F00078

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PE2017-2020/PI19%2F00287

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/PE2017-2020/PI20%2F00130

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)