Adapting the design of the ongoing RAMPART trial in response to external evidence: An example for trials which take many years to run and report

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Meade A, Frangou E, Choodari-Oskooei B] MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, UK. [Larkin J] Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. [Powles T] St Bartholomew's Hospital, W Smithfield, London, UK. [Stewart GD] University of Cambridge, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK. [Suarez C] Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2025-01-09T11:32:59Z

2025-01-09T11:32:59Z

2024-12

Abstract

Diseño de ensayo clínico; Cáncer renal; Terapia con inhibidores de puntos de control inmunitario


Disseny d'assaig clínic; Càncer renal; Teràpia amb inhibidors de punts de control immunitari


Clinical trial design; Renal cancer; Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy


Clinical trials to establish the efficacy of new agents in the adjuvant cancer setting typically take many years to complete. During that time, external factors can impact recruitment and reporting plans. An example is a new standard of care becoming available during the recruitment period. In this paper we describe how we modified the design of the RAMPART trial (NCT03288532) which was set up to investigate immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the adjuvant renal cancer setting. The trial had been initiated when no globally accepted adjuvant strategy after nephrectomy existed. A subsequent change in the standard of care for many patients with early renal cancer meant it was no longer feasible to continue to recruit. We needed to find a way to maximise the contribution that RAMPART participants could make to the evidence base for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy without introducing bias or detriment to the integrity of the trial results. We describe how we agreed and incorporated all design and timeline changes while remaining blinded to accumulating data within the trial, thus protecting the reliability of the future results. We share details of our design modifications to guide others who may have similar experiences, particularly as more agents and combinations of agents are developed and investigated in similar adjuvant settings.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications;42

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101381

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)