Impact of KRASG12 mutations on survival with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: post hoc analysis of the phase III SUNLIGHT trial

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Tabernero J] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Taieb J] Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris-Cité University, SIRIC CARPEM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Paris, France. [Fakih M] City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, USA. [Prager GW] Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Van Cutsem E] University Hospitals Gasthuisberg and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. [Ciardiello F] University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2024-03-20T07:59:48Z

2024-03-20T07:59:48Z

2024-03



Abstract

KRAS mutation; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Overall survival


Mutació KRAS; Càncer colorectal metastàtic; Supervivència global


Mutación KRAS; Cáncer colorrectal metastásico; Supervivencia global


Background In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), KRAS mutations are often associated with poorer survival; however, the prognostic impact of specific point mutations is unclear. In the phase III SUNLIGHT trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus FTD/TPI alone. We assessed the impact of KRASG12 mutational status on OS in SUNLIGHT. Patients and methods In the global, open-label, randomized, phase III SUNLIGHT trial, adults with mCRC who had received no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized 1 : 1 to receive FTD/TPI alone or FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab. In this post hoc analysis, OS was assessed according to the presence or absence of a KRASG12 mutation in the overall population and in patients with RAS-mutated tumors. Results Overall, 450 patients were analyzed, including 302 patients in the RAS mutation subgroup (214 with a KRASG12 mutation and 88 with a non-KRASG12 RAS mutation). In the overall population, similar OS outcomes were observed in patients with and without a KRASG12 mutation [median 8.3 and 9.2 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.4]. Similar OS outcomes were also observed in the subgroup analysis of patients with a KRASG12 mutation versus those with a non-KRASG12 RAS mutation (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.76-1.4). FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab improved OS compared with FTD/TPI alone irrespective of KRASG12 mutational status. Among patients with a KRASG12 mutation, the median OS was 9.4 months with FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab versus 7.2 months with FTD/TPI alone (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.93), and in patients without a KRASG12 mutation, the median OS was 11.3 versus 7.1 months, respectively (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.81). Conclusions The presence of a KRASG12 mutation had no detrimental effect on OS among patients treated in SUNLIGHT. The benefit of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab over FTD/TPI alone was confirmed independently of KRASG12 status.


This work was supported by Servier International Research Institute (France) and Taiho Oncology, Inc. (USA) (no grant number).

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Elsevier

Related items

ESMO Open;9(3)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102945

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)