Reporting reimbursement price decisions for onco-hematology drugs in Spain

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Elvira D] Departament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Sanofi, Paris, France. [Torres F] Biostatistics Unit, Medical School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain. [Vives R] Departament de Farmacologia, de Terapèutica i de Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Gerència del Medicament, Servei Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain. [Puig G, Gay D] Gerència del Medicament, Servei Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain. [Obach M] Sanofi, Paris, France. [Tabernero J] Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-11-21T06:57:44Z

2023-11-21T06:57:44Z

2023-10-24



Abstract

Health technology assessment; Onco-hematologic prices; Price and reimbursement systems


Avaluació de tecnologies sanitàries; Preus onco-hematològics; Sistemes de preus i reemborsament


Evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias; Precios oncohematológicos; Sistemas de precios y reembolsos


Introduction: Even using well-established technology assessment processes, the basis of the decisions on drug price and reimbursement are sometimes perceived as poorly informed and sometimes may be seen as disconnected from value. The literature remains inconclusive about how Health Technology Assessment Bodies (HTAb) should report the determinants of their decisions. This study evaluates the relationship between oncology and hematology drug list prices and structured value parameters at the time of reimbursement decision in Spain. Methods: The study includes all new onco-hematological products (22), with a first indication authorized between January 2017 and December 2019 in Spain and pricing decisions published up until October 2022. For each product, 56 contextual and non-contextual indicators reflecting the structured multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) – Evidence-based Decision-Making (EVIDEM) framework were measured. The relationship between prices and the MCDA-EVIDEM framework was explored using univariate statistical analyses. Results: Higher prices were observed when the standard of care included for combinations, if there were references to long-lasting responses, for fixed-duration treatment compared to treatment until progression and treatment with lower frequencies of administration; lower prices were observed for oral administration compared to other routes of administration. Statistically significant associations were observed between prices and the median duration of treatment, the impact on patient autonomy, the ease of use of the drug, and the recommendations of experts. Discussion: The study suggests that indicators related to the type of standard of care, references to long-lasting responders, the convenience of the use of the drug, and the impact of treatment on patient autonomy, as well as contextual indicators such as the existence of previous clinical consensus, are factors in setting oncology drug prices in Spain. The implementation of MCDA-EVIDEM methodologies may be useful to capture the influence on pricing decisions of additional factors not included in legislation or consolidated assessment frameworks such as the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EunetHTA) core model. It may be opportune to consider this in the upcoming revision of the Spanish regulation for health technology assessments and pricing and reimbursement procedures.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Frontiers Media

Related items

Frontiers in Public Health;11

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1265323

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)