Prioritization criteria of patients on scheduled waiting lists for abdominal wall hernia surgery: a cross-sectional study

Other authors

[López-Cano M] Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Rodrigues-Gonçalves V, Verdaguer-Tremolosa M, Petrola-Chacón C] Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. [Rosselló-Jiménez D] Servei de Geriatria, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Hospital de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. [Saludes-Serra J] Service of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, Hospital Universitario de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain

Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Publication date

2023-10-23T13:02:27Z

2023-10-23T13:02:27Z

2021-12



Abstract

Elective herniorrhaphy; Incisional hernia; Inguinal hernia


Herniorrafia electiva; Hernia incisional; Hernia inguinal


Herniorràfia electiva; Hèrnia incisional; Hèrnia inguinal


Purpose: Long delays in waiting lists have a negative impact on the principles of equity and providing timely access to care. This study aimed to assess waiting lists for abdominal wall hernia repair (incisional ventral vs. inguinal hernia) to define explicit prioritization criteria. Methods: A cross-sectional single-center study was designed. Patients in the waiting list for incisional/ventral hernia (n = 42) and inguinal hernia (n = 50) repair were interviewed by phone and completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires (EQ-5D, COMI-hernia, HerQLes) as a measure of severity. Priority was measured as hernia complexity, patient frailty using the modified frailty index (mFI-11), and the consumption of analgesics for hernia. Results: The mean (SD) time on the waiting list was 5.5 (3.2) months (range 1-14). Complex hernia was present in 34.8% of the patients. HRQoL was moderately poor in patients with incisional/ventral hernia (mean HerQL score 66.1), whereas it was moderately good in patients with inguinal hernia (mean COMI-hernia score 3.40). The use of analgesics was higher in patients with incisional/ventral hernia as compared with those with inguinal hernia (1.48 [0.54] vs. 1.31 [0.51], P = 0.021). Worst values of mFI were associated with inguinal hernia as compared with incisional/ventral hernia (0.21 [0.14] vs. 0.12 [0.11]; P = 0.010). Conclusion: Explicit criteria for prioritization in the waiting lists may be the consumption of analgesics for patients with incisional/ventral hernia and frailty for patients with inguinal hernia. A reasonable approach seems to establish separate waiting lists for incisional/ventral hernia and inguinal hernia repair.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

Hernia;25

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02378-9

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)