Do the current MS clinical course descriptors need to change and if so how? A survey of the MS community

Other authors

Institut Català de la Salut

[Thompson AJ] Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK. [Moccia M] Department of Molecular Biology and Molecular Biotechnology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Policlinico Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy. [Amato MP] Department NEUROFARBA, Section of Neurosciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy. [Calabresi PA] Department of Neurology and The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. [Finlayson M] School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada. [Hawton A] University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. [Montalban X] Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (CEMCAT), Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus

Publication date

2023-10-18T07:35:20Z

2023-10-18T07:35:20Z

2023-10

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis; Clinical course; Progression


Esclerosis múltiple; Curso clínico; Progresión


Esclerosi múltiple; Curs clínic; Progressió


Background and Objectives: The current clinical course descriptors of multiple sclerosis (MS) include a combination of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Recently there has been a growing call to base these descriptors more firmly on biological mechanisms. We investigated the implications of proposing a new mechanism-driven framework for describing MS. Methods: In a web-based survey, multiple stakeholders rated the need to change current MS clinical course descriptors, the definitions of disease course and their value in clinical practice and related topics. Results: We received 502 responses across 49 countries. In all, 77% of the survey respondents supported changing the current MS clinical course descriptors. They preferred a framework that informs treatment decisions, aids the design and conduct of clinical trials, allows patients to understand their disease, and links disease mechanisms and clinical expression of disease. Clinical validation before dissemination and ease of communication to patients were rated as the most important aspects to consider when developing any new framework for describing MS. Conclusion: A majority of MS stakeholders agreed that the current MS clinical course descriptors need to change. Any change process will need to engage a wide range of affected stakeholders and be guided by foundational principles.


This work and the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in MS are funded by the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Related items

Multiple Sclerosis Journal;29(11-12)

https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585231196786

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)