Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines

Other authors

[Lalanza JF] Department of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Department of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. [Lorente S] Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Servei de Pediatria, Hospital de Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. [Bullich R, García C] Department of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Losilla JM] Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Sport Research Institute UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. [Capdevila Ll] Department of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Sport Research Institute UAB, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. Departament of Basic Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Publication date

2023-08-31T11:51:20Z

2023-08-31T11:51:20Z

2023-03-14



Abstract

Lista de control; Frecuencia cardíaca; Biorretroalimentación psicológica


Llista de control; Freqüència cardíaca; Bioretroalimentació psicològica


Check list; Heart rate; Psychological biofeedback


Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual's resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) "Optimal RF" (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) "Individual RF" (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) "Preset-pace RF" (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported.


Open Access Funding provided by Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

Springer

Related items

Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback;48(3)

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-023-09582-6

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)