Endoscopic treatment (endoscopic balloon dilation/self-expandable metal stent) vs surgical resection for the treatment of de novo stenosis in Crohn's disease (ENDOCIR study): an open-label, multicentre, randomized trial

Other authors

[Loras C] Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain. [Ruiz-Ramirez P, Andújar X] Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain. [Romero J] Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain. [Bargallo J, Monfort D] Servei de Digestiu, Hospital de Terrassa, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. [Bernardos E] Hospital General La Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain

Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Publication date

2023-08-24T08:10:43Z

2023-08-24T08:10:43Z

2023-06-27



Abstract

Crohn Disease; Self expandable metallic stents; Gastric dilatation


Enfermedad de Crohn; Stents metálicos autoexpandibles; Dilatación gástrica


Malaltia de Crohn; Pròtesis de stent; Dilatació gàstrica


Background: Stenosis is one of the most common complications in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the treatment of choice for a short stenosis adjacent to the anastomosis from previous surgery. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) may be a suitable treatment option for longer stenoses. To date, however, there is no scientific evidence as to whether endoscopic (EBD/SEMS) or surgical treatment is the best approach for de novo or primary stenoses that are less than 10 cm in length. Methods/design: Exploratory study as "proof-of-concept", multicentre, open-label, randomized trial of the treatment of de novo stenosis in the CD; endoscopic treatment (EBD/SEMS) vs surgical resection (SR). The type of endoscopic treatment will initially be with EDB; if a therapeutic failure occurs, then a SEMS will be placed. We estimate 2 years of recruitment and 1 year of follow-up for the assessment of quality of life, costs, complications, and clinical recurrence. After the end of the study, patients will be followed up for 3 years to re-evaluate the variables over the long term. Forty patients with de novo stenosis in CD will be recruited from 15 hospitals in Spain and will be randomly assigned to the endoscopic or surgical treatment groups. The primary aim will be the evaluation of the patient quality of life at 1 year follow-up (% of patients with an increase of 30 points in the 32-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32). The secondary aim will be evaluation of the clinical recurrence rate, complications, and costs of both treatments at 1-year follow-up. Discussion: The ENDOCIR trial has been designed to determine whether an endoscopic or surgical approach is therapeutically superior in the treatment of de novo stenosis in CD.


This study received a grant (FSEED; ) from the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy in 2022. Taewoong provided the stents for the study free of charge, but had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Document Type

Article


Published version

Language

English

Publisher

BMC

Related items

Trials;24

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07447-1

Recommended citation

This citation was generated automatically.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This item appears in the following Collection(s)