dc.contributor.author
Botta, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Matsuda, Tomohiro
dc.contributor.author
Charvat, Hadrien
dc.contributor.author
Chiang, Chun-ju
dc.contributor.author
Lee, Wen-Chung
dc.contributor.author
Van Gestel, Anna Jacoba
dc.contributor.author
Martin, Frank
dc.contributor.author
Geleijnse, Gijs
dc.contributor.author
Cellamare, Matteo
dc.contributor.author
Bonfarnuzzo, Simone
dc.contributor.author
Marcos-Gragera, Rafael
dc.contributor.author
Guevara, Marcela
dc.contributor.author
Mousavi, Mohsen
dc.contributor.author
Craig, Stephanie
dc.contributor.author
Rodrigues, Jessica
dc.contributor.author
Rubió Casadevall, Jordi
dc.contributor.author
Licitra, Lisa
dc.contributor.author
Cavalieri, Stefano
dc.contributor.author
Resteghini, Carlo
dc.contributor.author
Gatta, Gemma
dc.contributor.author
Trama, Annalisa
dc.contributor.author
RARECAREnet working group
dc.date.accessioned
2024-10-29T21:24:52Z
dc.date.available
2024-10-29T21:24:52Z
dc.date.issued
2023-09-13
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/25149
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/10256/25149
dc.description.abstract
Background: The head and neck cancers (HNCs) incidence differs between Europe and East Asia. Our objective was to determine whether survival of HNC also differs between European and Asian countries.
Methods: We used population-based cancer registry data to calculate 5-year relative survival (RS) for the oral cavity, hypopharynx, larynx, nasal cavity, and major salivary gland in Europe, Taiwan, and Japan. We modeled RS with a generalized linear model adjusting for time since diagnosis, sex, age, subsite, and histological grouping. Analyses were performed using federated learning, which enables analyses without sharing sensitive data.
Findings: Five-year RS for HNC varied between geographical areas. For each HNC site, Europe had a lower RS than both Japan and Taiwan. HNC subsites and histologies distribution and survival differed between the three areas. Differences between Europe and both Asian countries persisted even after adjustments for all HNC sites but nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, when comparing Europe and Taiwan.
Interpretation: Survival differences can be attributed to different factors including different period of diagnosis, more advanced stage at diagnosis, or different availability/access of treatment. Cancer registries did not have stage and treatment information to further explore the reasons of the observed survival differences. Our analyses have confirmed federated learning as a feasible approach for data analyses that addresses the challenges of data sharing and urge for further collaborative studies including relevant prognostic factors
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fonc.2023.1219111
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2234-943X
dc.rights
Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
Frontiers in Oncology, 2023, vol. 13, art. núm. 1219111
dc.source
Articles publicats (IdIBGi)
dc.subject
Coll -- Càncer
dc.subject
Neck -- Cancer
dc.subject
Head -- Cancer
dc.title
Head and neck cancers survival in Europe, Taiwan, and Japan: results from RARECAREnet Asia based on a privacy-preserving federated infrastructure
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion