Analysis of Fossil Planktonic Foraminifera: The Sieve Mesh Effect

dc.contributor.author
Di Donato, Valentino
dc.contributor.author
Martín Fernández, Josep Antoni
dc.contributor.author
Daunis-i-Estadella, Pepus
dc.contributor.author
Esposito, Paola
dc.date.accessioned
2024-10-29T08:21:58Z
dc.date.available
2024-10-29T08:21:58Z
dc.date.issued
2011-05-13
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/13653
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/10256/13653
dc.description.abstract
The choice of the sediment size fraction in the analysis of fossil planktonic foraminifera is of great importance in determining the composition of assemblages. In past studies several size fractions have been utilised. Imbrie and Kipp (1971) stated that “smaller fractions give rise to too many uncertainties in the identification of small specimens and require too long to process. Large mesh size yield undesiderable loss of small species, and small specimens of larger species”. The adoption of coarser sieve meshes has the effect to reduce the percentages of small sized (usually living in cold waters) species (Bé and Hutson, 1977). In a comparison between >63 μm and >150 μm size-fraction of planktonic foraminifera assemblages from NW Atlantic Ocean, Smart (2002), stated that because particular smaller species are either under-represented or even absent from the larger (>150 μm) size-fraction, the smaller (>63 μm) size-fraction must be included in studies of planktonic foraminifera. Di Donato et al. (2008) highlighted in the >150 μm size fraction of a core from the Tyrrhenian Sea, a great loss of the small-sized species Turborotalita quinqueloba in glacial samples, where this species is very abundant. This caused an increase in warm water species such as Globigerinoides ruber, apparently reaching typical Holocene values in some full glacial levels. From the above mentioned statements, it is clear that treatment changes can strongly influence the results of palaeoclimatic reconstructions based on planktonic foraminiferal assemblages. As stated by Aitchison (1986, 1992) scale invariance and subcompositional coherence are fundamental properties of the compositional data analysis (CODA). The main goal of this paper is to verify if the variable relationships pointing out from CODA of foraminiferal assemblages are or not influenced by the size fraction and, more in general, to test the robustness of CODA respect to treatment changes related to different preparation techniques for the analysis of planktonic foraminifera
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language
eng
dc.publisher
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics en Enginyeria (CIMNE)
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-84-87867-76-7
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
© International Workshop on Compositional Data Analysis (4th: 2011: Sant Feliu de GuÍxols, Girona). CODAWORK 2011: International Workshop on Compositional Data Analysis, hold on May 9-13rd. 2011, Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Girona
dc.source
Llibres / Capítols de LLibre (D-IMAE)
dc.subject
Estadística matemàtica -- Congressos
dc.subject
Mathematical statistics -- Congresses
dc.subject
Anàlisi multivariable -- Congressos
dc.subject
Mathematical statistics -- Congresses
dc.subject
Foraminífers fòssils -- Mètodes estadístics -- Congressos
dc.subject
Foraminifera, Fossil -- Statistical methods -- Congresses
dc.title
Analysis of Fossil Planktonic Foraminifera: The Sieve Mesh Effect
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.