dc.contributor.author
Kristan, Andrej
dc.date.accessioned
2024-06-18T11:32:01Z
dc.date.available
2024-06-18T11:32:01Z
dc.date.issued
2016-10-03
dc.identifier
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/13443
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10256/13443
dc.description.abstract
The paper constitutes an appeal to redefine the concept of the fallibility of final judicial decisions. Its standard understanding, based on Hart's work, is far more problematic than is usually assumed. The author shows that the usual understanding gives rise to a contradiction. Namely, that it is (sometimes) legally correct to do that which is not legally correct. The author then briefly tests three methods of solving the problem. He concludes that none of them speaks in favour of distinguishing between the finality and infallibility of judicial decisions. Accordingly, he re-examines Hart's motivations for embracing that distinction and identifies a misstep in his reasoning
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Università degli studi di Genova - Facoltà di Giurisprudenza - Dipartimento di cultura giuridica Giovanni Tarello
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1126-5779
dc.rights
Tots els drets reservats
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source
© Analisi e diritto: ricerche di giurisprudenza analitica, 2016, vol. 2016, p. 339-344
dc.source
Articles publicats (D-DP)
dc.source
Kristan, Andrej 2016 A Paradox of Hart's Fallible Finality Analisi e diritto : ricerche di giurisprudenza analitica 2016 339 344
dc.subject
Hart, H. L. A. (Herbert Lionel Adolphus), 1907-1992
dc.title
A Paradox of Hart's Fallible Finality
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
