dc.contributor.author
Márquez-Rodas, Iván
dc.contributor.author
Vidal, Joana
dc.contributor.author
Foro Arnalot, Palmira
dc.contributor.author
Berrocal Jaime, Alfonso
dc.date.accessioned
2026-02-10T06:57:21Z
dc.date.available
2026-02-10T06:57:21Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02-09T17:26:02Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02-09T17:26:02Z
dc.date.issued
2026-02-09T17:26:01Z
dc.identifier
Márquez-Rodas I, Álvarez A, Arance A, Valduvieco I, Berciano-Guerrero MÁ, Delgado R, Soria A, Lopez Campos F, Sánchez P, Romero JL, Martin-Liberal J, Lucas A, Díaz-Beveridge R, Conde-Moreno AJ, Álamo de la Gala MDC, García-Castaño A, Prada PJ, González Cao M, Puertas E, Vidal J, Foro P, Aguado de la Rosa C, Corona JA, Cerezuela-Fuentes P, López P, Luna P, Aymar N, Puértolas T, Sanagustín P, Berrocal A. Encorafenib and binimetinib followed by radiotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastases (E-BRAIN/GEM1802 phase II study). Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(11):2074-2083. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae116
dc.identifier
https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72500
dc.identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae116
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/72500
dc.description.abstract
Background: Encorafenib plus binimetinib (EB) is a standard-of-care treatment for advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. We assessed the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastasis (BM) and explored if radiotherapy improves the duration of response. Methods: E-BRAIN/GEM1802 was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial that enrolled patients with melanoma BRAFV600-mutant and BM. Patients received encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg BID, and those who achieved a partial response or stable disease at first tumor assessment were offered radiotherapy. Treatment continued until progression. Primary endpoint was intracranial response rate (icRR) after 2 months of EB, establishing a futility threshold of 60%. Results: The study included 25 patients with no BM symptoms and 23 patients with BM symptoms regardless of using corticosteroids. Among them, 31 patients (64.6%) received sequential radiotherapy. After 2 months, icRR was 70.8% (95% CI: 55.9-83.1); 10.4% complete response. Median intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 8.5 (95% CI: 6.4-11.8) and 15.9 (95% CI: 10.7-21.4) months, respectively (8.3 months for icPFS and 13.9 months OS for patients receiving RDT). Most common grades 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (10.4%). Conclusions: Encorafenib plus binimetinib showed promising clinical benefit in terms of icRR, and tolerable safety profile with low frequency of high-grade TRAEs, in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and BM, including those with symptoms and need for steroids. Sequential radiotherapy is feasible but it does not seem to prolong response.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Oxford University Press
dc.relation
Neuro-Oncology. 2024;26(11):2074-2083
dc.rights
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject
Brain metastasis
dc.subject
Encorafenib and binimetinib
dc.subject
Targeted therapy
dc.title
Encorafenib and binimetinib followed by radiotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastases (E-BRAIN/GEM1802 phase II study)
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion